X hits on this document

148 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

23 / 52

Appendix 7

CB 21 Rubric-Vetting Data Results as of April 11, 2009

Discipline

Number of answered all/

respondents

Approval

Contingent

Approval

Doesn’t work

other

4 levels adequate

6 levels adequate

comments on levels

  other comments

Math

85/79

59

(74.7%)

18

(22.8%)

1

(1.3%)

1

(1.3%)

86.1%

none

6.3% wanted 3 levels, 5.1% five levels

need to deal with geometry

1 or 2 levels below

Reading

31/29

12

(42.9%)

14

(50%)

1

(3.6%)

2

(7.1%)

50%

few

25% want only 3 levels & 10.7% more than 4

78.6% (22) want  grade levels included

ESL

35

ESL writing

21

9

(42.9%)

10

(47.6%)

1

(4.8%)

1

(4.8%)

3

(14.3%)

16

(76.2%)

some decisions based on local course offerings

including word count  61.9% yes 38.1% no

ESL listening & speaking

10

5

(50%)

5

(50%)

0

0

100%

ESL reading

4

3(75%)

1(25%)

0

0

0

75%

25% (1) 5 levels

English

69

38

(55.1%)

27

(39.1%)

3

(4.3%)

1

(1.4%)

30

(43.5%)

3

(4.5%)

much relates to ESL & student population

40.6% (28)

3 levels

word counts 52.2% helpful; 47.8% not helpful

Chapter 12                                                                                                                                  23

Document info
Document views148
Page views148
Page last viewedSat Dec 10 11:27:56 UTC 2016
Pages52
Paragraphs1133
Words12279

Comments