X hits on this document

PDF document

Polyurethane Concrete Slab-Jacking VS Conventional “Mud”-Jacking - page 3 / 3

7 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

3 / 3

Polyurethane-Conventional Comparison

APGMA

Conclusion: Basic approved mix designs are available upon request at no charge, please email project information and any other specifications required. (www.apgma.com) As a reporting institution American Pressure Grouting & Mudjacking Association encourages any information or comments in regards to this study. Our goal is to report any technical data which benefits Slab-Jacking. Please feel free to email your comments or questions to www.apgma.com

Disclaimer: The information provided in this study which includes technical descriptions, details, and case study results presented herein is for informational purposes only. American Pressure Grouting & Mudjacking Association and Black-Jack Grout Pumps Inc. are not responsible or liable for any end results. There are no warranties either expressed or implied, regarding the accuracy or completeness of this information.

Work Cited / Bibliography:

U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration: www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/recycling/fach09.cfm

Portland cement Association: www.cement.org

Tool Base Services: www.toolbase.org/Technology-Inventory/Foundations/Fly-ash-concrete

Mother Earth News: www.motherearthnews.com/Ask-Our-Experts/Green-Homes/Fly-Ash-Concrete.aspx

Headwaters Resources: www.flyash.com/data/upimages/press/HWR brochure flyash.pdf

HMI: www.mudpumps.com/otherproducts/polyurethane-equipment

Page 3 of 3

August 17, 2010

Document info
Document views7
Page views7
Page last viewedSun Dec 04 10:53:41 UTC 2016
Pages3
Paragraphs34
Words909

Comments