Figure 32 Treatment Completion
Terminated By Facility
Against Professional Advice
Closed for Unknown Re a so n
Criminal Justice System
Closure Status/ Reason M i ssi n g
Although the rate of treatment entry was higher than those of comparable projects and the treatment completion for PTP participants was comparable (and could be higher, since 20% were still in treatment at the end of the project), the rate still was relatively low. Factors that could explain the low treatment completion rate include lack of accessible treatment facilities, lack of state funding for treatment during several months of the study, the complexity of meth- amphetamine addiction in a population typically oppressed by financial duress, and co-occur- ring mental and physical problems.
3. CHILD SAFETY AND PERMANENCY (REMAIN HOME AND REUNIFICATION) OUTCOMES
A primary objective of the PTP was to increase the likelihood of family reunification and to decrease subsequent child maltreatment substantiated referrals. Data from participants were collected from program entry through a six-month follow-up from the Idaho Child Welfare FOCUS information system.
In comparison to Idaho as a whole (State of Idaho Child Welfare Outcome Measures Report, FOCUS information system), children in the PTP were significantly less likely than children in the state as a whole during the same time period to experience a substantiated re-referral during the PTP and at six-month follow-up (Figure 33).
Idaho Pre-Treatment Program