Home during Program &
Figure 35 Child Status During Program and Follow-up
Out of Home during Program & Follow-up
Child Safety. A primary objective of the PTP was to decrease subsequent child maltreatment substantiated referrals. In comparison to Idaho as a whole (State of Idaho Child Welfare Out- come Measures Report , FOCUS information system), children in the PTP were significantly less likely than children in the state as a whole during the same time period to experience a substantiated re-referral during the PTP and at six-month follow-up.
Permanency: Remaining Home and Reunification. The Illinois Demonstration project using “recovery coaches” reported a returned home rate of 15.5% compared to their control group rate of 11.6%. Meanwhile, PTP showed that 27% (39 of the 144 children) who were initially out of home at referral were returned home during the program and at six-month follow-up.
Eighty-six percent (34%) of all 250 children were able to remain at home during the program and at six-month follow-up even though they had received an initial substantiated referral.
The higher PTP rate of 27% with another 34% able to remain in the home does not reflect the ideal, but it is very encouraging given the history of family reunification difficulties with this population.
Idaho Pre-Treatment Program