X hits on this document

272 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

90 / 95

requirements for their response teams because there is no national strategy with clearly

defined outcomes.”4

5

1Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University and The Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis, Inc., Final Report on Strategic Responsiveness, Early and Continuous Joint Effectiveness--Across the Spectrum, April 2000, Panel 6, 35.

2Federal Bureau of Investigation, Weapons of Mass Destruction Incident Contingency Plan, 26 August 1998, 6.

3Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, “Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld Interview on Fox News Sunday,” 11 February 2001. www.defenselink.mil.

4United States General Accounting Office, Report to Congressional Requesters, “Combating Terrorism--Federal Response Teams Provide Varied Capabilities; Opportunities Remain to Improve Coordination,” GAO-01-14, November 2000. 26.

5

79

Document info
Document views272
Page views274
Page last viewedSat Dec 10 07:01:21 UTC 2016
Pages95
Paragraphs2013
Words21971

Comments