X hits on this document

234 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

28 / 87

clear

1

2

3

4

5

unclear

precise

1

2

3

4

5

imprecise

specific

1

2

3

4

5

vague

accurate

1

2

3

4

5

inaccurate

relevant

1

2

3

4

5

irrelevant

believable

1

2

3

4

5

implausible

consistent

1

2

3

4

5

contradictory

fair

1

2

3

4

5

biased

logical

1

2

3

4

5

illogical

deep

1

2

3

4

5

superficial

broad

1

2

3

4

5

narrow

complete

1

2

3

4

5

incomplete

What is the single most important thing that could be done to improve this document?

adapted from Using Internet Primary Sources to Teach Critical Thinking Skills in History by Kathleen W. Craver (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood, 1999)

4. Evaluating Critical Thought

On a scale of 1 to 5, please characterize how well these standards of critical thought were met in the document under review

28

Document info
Document views234
Page views234
Page last viewedSat Dec 10 17:08:06 UTC 2016
Pages87
Paragraphs1573
Words26774

Comments