X hits on this document

PDF document

Reading Recovery: A Scientifically Based Analysis - page 20 / 21

56 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

20 / 21

20

Glynn, T., Crooks, T., Bethune, N., Ballard, K., & Smith, J. (1989). Reading Recovery in context: Implementation and outcomes. Educational Psychology, 12(3&4), 249-261

Glynn, T., Crooks, T., Bethune, N., Ballard, K., & Smith, J. (1992). Reading recovery in context: Implementation and outcome. Educational Psychology, 12, (3 & 4), 249-261

Hiebert, E. (1994) Reading recovery in the United States: What difference does it make to an age cohort? Educational Researcher, 23(9), 15-25

Hiebert, E., Colt J., , Catto, S., & Gury, E. (1992). Reading and writing of first-grade students in a restructured chapter 1 program. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 545-572.

Iversen, S., & Tunmer, W.E. (1993). Phonological processing skills and the reading recovery program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, (1), 112-126.

Iversen, S. (1997). Reading Recovery as a small group intervention. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

Johnson, B. (1989). DSTAT: Software for the meta-analytic review of research literatures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Morris, D., Tyner, B. & Perney, J. (2000). Early Steps: Replicating the effects of a first grade reading intervention program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92. 681-993

Nicholson, T. (1989). A comment on Reading Recovery. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 24, 95-97.

Pinnell, G. S.,(1989) Reading Recovery: Helping at risk children learn to read. The Elementary School Journal, 90(2), 159-181

Pinnell, G.S., Lyons, C.A., Deford, D. E., Bryk, A.S., & Seltzer, M. (1994). Comparing instructional models for the literary education of high-risk first graders. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 8-39.

Pinnell, G.S., & Lyons, C. (1995). Responding to Hiebert: What difference does Reading recovery make? Unpublished manuscript.

Rasinski, T.V. (1995). Commentary on the effects of reading recovery: A response to Pinnell, Lyons, DeFord, Bryk, and Seltzer. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 264-270.

Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching Children to Read. An Evidence Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and its Implications for Reading Instruction. Reports of the Subgroups. (2000).

Document info
Document views56
Page views56
Page last viewedTue Dec 06 20:32:52 UTC 2016
Pages21
Paragraphs462
Words5914

Comments