X hits on this document

PDF document

Alternative Cancer Remedies - page 179 / 200

796 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

179 / 200

178

Alternate Cancer Remedies

ably, no one was thereby cured of cancer! Instead, the radiation produced large numbers of muta- tions (all of which produced terrible results) and various diseases, including cancer. Mutations can- not cause the beneficial changes evolutionary theory requires, and radiation cannot cure can- cer.

CHEMOTHERAPY

Unlike all other chemical treatments for drugs, the officially approved (orthodox) chemi- cal treatment is based on the concept that ev- ery cell in the area of the tumor should be killed, in the hope that the cancer will be destroyed. For this reason, chemotherapy treatment consists of the administering of very powerful (powerful!) poisons.

Only those chemical compounds are used which are guaranteed to kill cells.

Chemotherapy began in 1919, when nitrogen mustard was given to leukemia patients. As al- ways, the hope was that the strong poison would kill the cancer before it killed the patient.

Regardless of where the cancer is, the re- sultant poisoning affects the entire system. Dead blood cells cause blood poisoning while violent nausea, diarrhea, loss of appetite, and cramps occur in the stomach and intestines. The re- productive organs are affected, producing ste- rility or impotency. The brain is wracked with pain. Eyesight and hearing are damaged. The poison is so bad, even the hair falls out!

Yet it is well-known among immunologists that one of the best defenses the body has against cancer is a healthy and well-functioning immu- nological system, which is centered in the white blood cells.

“The importance of the immune system in the defense against neoplastic disease [cancer] seems established. The high incidence of can- cer of various types in patients with immune deficiency diseases and in patients who have received immunosuppressive therapy, espe- cially after kidney transplantation, supports the concept that rejection of an incipient malignancy is an important function of the immune sys- tem.”—Annals of the New York Academy of Science, Vol. 230, op. cit., 45. Indeed, Dr. George Friou declared that the for- mation of new cancer cells is not unusual, but are normally overcome by the immune system, before they develop into a recognizable malig- nancy. But, in order to do that, the immune system must not be in a shattered state. (George J. Friou, M.D., “Relationship of Malignancy, Au- toimmunity, and Immunological Disease,” Annals

of the New York Academy of Sciences, March 18, 1974, 44-45, 48).

Yet the function of chemotherapy drugs, by the design of the drug companies and the re- quest of orthodox medicine—is to destroy the body’s immune system, in the hope that, by doing so, the cancer will die! (“Spontaneous Re- gression of Cancer: The Metabolic Triumph of the Host?” Annals of the New York Academy of Sci- ence, 130.)

  • But this will only result in the chemotherapy

producing more cancer than it cures! You will recall that, in 1919, nitrogen mustard gas was the first chemotherapy given to cancer pa- tients. A little over 20 years later, it was found that workers making mustard gas during World War II had far higher rates of lung cancer (Ency- clopedia Britannica, 15th ed., 764). Listen to this: All the currently accepted che- motherapy drugs were given, one at a time, to test animals which had no malignancies,—and produced cancers in those previously healthy animals! (NCI research contract PH-43-68-998.) Commenting on such facts, Dr. Dean Burk, while head of the Cytochemistry Division of the NCI, made this statement: “Virtually all of the chemotherapeutic anti- cancer agents now approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use or testing in hu- man cancer patients are (1) highly or variously toxic at applied dosages; (2) markly immuno- suppressive, that is, destructive of the patient’s native resistance to a variety of diseases includ- ing cancer; and (3) carcinogenic [cancer caus- ing] . . I submit that a program and series of the FDA-approved compounds that yield only 5%-10% “effectiveness” can scarcely be de- scribed as “excellent,” the more so since it rep- resents the total production of a thirty-year ef- fort on the part of all of us in the cancer therapy field.”—Dean Burk, Ph.D., Letter dated April 20, 1973, to the head of the NCI.

As if that seems unbelievable enough, read this: “As yet, no drugs are available to cure most malignant tumors.”—Textbook of Medical-Sur- gical Nursing, 874.

“No chemical agent capable of inducing a gen- eral curative effect on disseminated forms of cancer has yet been developed.”—Dr. Robert Sullivan of the Lahey Clinic Foundation, speech at the NCI Clinical Center auditorium, May 18, 1972.

“A cure from chemotherapeutic agents is not considered valid.”—“Spontaneous Regression of Cancer: The Metabolic Triumph of the Host?” Annals of the New York Academy of Science,

Document info
Document views796
Page views796
Page last viewedFri Dec 09 04:37:41 UTC 2016
Pages200
Paragraphs5906
Words148734

Comments