X hits on this document

416 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

104 / 156

Appendix C.2 - Supplementary QA Form for Qualitative Evidence32

  • 1.

    How credible are the findings?

  • 2.

    How has knowledge/understanding been extended by the research?

  • 3.

    How well does the study address the original aims and purpose?

  • 4.

    How well is the scope for drawing wider inference explained?

  • 5.

    How defensible is the research design?

  • 6.

    How well defended is the sample design/target selection of cases?

  • 7.

    Sample composition/case inclusion - how well is coverage described?

  • 8.

    How well was the data collection carried out?

  • 9.

    How well was the approach to/formulation of the analysis conveyed?

  • 10.

    How well are the contexts of data sources retained/portrayed?

  • 11.

    How well has diversity of perspective and content been explored?

  • 12.

    How well has detail, depth and richness of data been conveyed?

  • 13.

    How clear are the links between data, interpretation and conclusions?

  • 14.

    How clear and coherent is the reporting?

  • 15.

    How clear are the assumptions/theoretical perspectives/values that

shaped the form and output of the study?

  • 16.

    What evidence is there of attention to ethical issues?

  • 17.

    How adequately has the research process been documented?

32

The framework is provided in more detail in Spencer et al. (2003)

Effectiveness of Occupational Health & Safety Management Systems: A Systematic Review

101

Document info
Document views416
Page views420
Page last viewedFri Dec 02 23:03:06 UTC 2016
Pages156
Paragraphs3709
Words49639

Comments