X hits on this document

Powerpoint document

The Litigation Side of Forensic Accounting Copyrighted 2001 D. Larry Crumbley, CPA, Cr.FA, CFD KPMG ... - page 148 / 275

1213 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

148 / 275

148

© D.L. Crumbley

Second, his isolation of data as to certain transactions, on certain dates, chosen from a few transactions selected by respondent among hundreds engaged in by petitioner, is not reasonably representative. It is also inconsistent with his own statement that his analysis must consider “the investor’s overall strategy.”

Third, his assumption of predictability of stock prices is inconsistent with reality and with the existence of an active national options exchange in which differing views of the future create buyers and sellers at different prices.

Source: B.J. Raby and W.L. Raby, “Reasonable Compensation, Expert Witnesses, and the Tax Practitioner,” Tax Notes, September 15, 2003, pp. 1417-1418.

Rejecting Experts

Document info
Document views1213
Page views1213
Page last viewedFri Jan 20 10:16:20 UTC 2017
Pages275
Paragraphs3453
Words27645

Comments