X hits on this document

117 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

12 / 31

(i)works

* Hawkes & Sons (London) Ltd v Paramount Films Services [1934] 1 Ch 593 (RR 2005 at 260-262)

Ladbroke (Football) v William Hill [1964] I All ER 465; 1 WLR 273 (RR 2005 at 262)

Autodesk v Dyason [2002] FCA 1206 (RR 2005 at 262)

Data Access Corporation v Powerflex Services Pty Limited (1999) 45 IPR 353 (RR 2005 at 264-268)

Walt Disney v HJ Edwards Publishing (1954) 71 WN (NSW) 150

(ii)other subject matter

Network Ten Pty Ltd v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd (2004) 59 IPR 1 (RR 2005 at 268)

(b)Need for a causal connection

*Corelli v Gray (1913) 29 TLR 570 (RR 2005 at 276-277)

*Francis Day & Hunter Ltd v Bron [1963] Ch 587 (MBG 2007 at 211; RR 2005 at 277-283)

(c)Need for resemblance or objective similarity

(i)General

* Kenrick v Lawrence (1890) 25 QB 99 (RR 2005 at 285-287)

(ii)Particular example: Literary and dramatic works: plots and characters

* Universal City Studios Inc v Zeccola [1982] AIPC 90-019 (RR 2005 at 287-292)

(d)

Case study: Infringement of one exclusive right - ‘the right of public performance’

*APRA v Tolbush (1985) 7 IPR 160 (RR 2005 at 364-366)

*Rank Films v Dodds (1983) 2 IPR 113 (RR 2005 at 366-370)

*APRA v Commonwealth Bank (1992) 25 IPR 157

(11)Direct infringement of subject matter other than works

RR 2005 at 383-389

(12)Authorisation of infringement of copyright in works and other subject matter

ss36(1) and 101(1) CA

(i)General

* UNSW v Moorhouse (1975) 133 CLR 1

APRA v Jain (1990) 18 IPR 663 (RR 2005 at 390-395)

Australasian Performing Right Association Ltd v Metro on George [2004] FCA 1123 (31 August 2004) per Bennett J

APRA v Cougars Tavern [2008] FMCA 369 (28 March 2008): liability of operator and two company directors

Document info
Document views117
Page views117
Page last viewedFri Jan 20 17:04:00 UTC 2017
Pages31
Paragraphs1133
Words8078

Comments