X hits on this document

82 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

14 / 31

Prior v Sheldon (2000) 48 IPR 301

Aristocrat Technologies Australia v DAP Services (Kempsey) Pty Ltd [2007] FCAFC 40 (29 March 2007)

(ii)Additional damages – s115(4)

* Autodesk Australia Pty Limited v Cheung (1990) 17 IPR 69 (RR 2005 at 455-457)

APRA v Pashalides 2000 (2000) 48 IPR 610

* Zero Tolerance Entertainment Inc v Venus Adult Shops Pty Ltd [2007] FMCA 155.

(c)Offences – Part V, Div 5 CA

(16)Moral Rights – Part IX CA

Reading:

MSG 2004 at 141-146

RR 2005 at 409-418

Meskenas v ACP Publishing Pty Ltd [2006] FMCA 1136 (14 August 2006)

3.  INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS

Required reading

MSG 2004: ch 10

RR 2005: ch 9

Special Note: Students should be aware that the Designs Act 1906 (Cth) was replaced by the Designs Act 2003 (Cth) which commenced on 17 June 2004.  Our focus on this course is on the 2003 Act. Students are not expected to be aware of the provisions of the 1906 Act.

(1)Requirements for registration

(a)Meaning of ‘design’

Definition of ‘design’ – s5 Designs Act 2003 (“DA”)

‘product’ – s6 DA

‘visual features’ – s7 DA

‘overall appearance of the product’ – see s5 DA

* Re Wolanski’s Registered Design (1953) 88 CLR 278 (RR 2005 at 534)

(b)

Novelty and distinctiveness

Threshold statement under s15 DA

‘prior art base’ – s15(2) DA

(i)

prior public use of the design

(ii)

prior publication in a document

* J Rapee & Co Pty Ltd v Kas Cushions Pty Ltd (1990) 15 IPR 577 (RR 2005 at 544)

(iii)

disclosure in an earlier design application

Document info
Document views82
Page views82
Page last viewedMon Dec 05 18:53:31 UTC 2016
Pages31
Paragraphs1133
Words8078

Comments