X hits on this document

87 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

23 / 31

(v)quantum meruit (contemplated by MSG 2004 at 117)

(vi)equitable compensation

* Talbot v General Television Corporation Pty Ltd [1980] VR 224

Cadbury Schweppes Inc v FBI Foods Ltd (1999) 167 DLR 4th 577 (RR 2005 at 647)

The notion of the springboard

MSG 2004 at 92-94

(3)Contractual obligations of confidence

(a)

Contractual duties: express or implied

Common law contractual duties: express or implied

Implied equitable duty to serve employer with good faith

Del Casale v Artedomus (Aust) Pty Ltd [2007] NSWCA 172 (18 July 2007)

(b)Scope of obligation

Maggbury Pty Ltd v Hafele Australia Pty Ltd [2001] HCA 70; (2001) 185 ALR 152

(c)Example context: Employees and restraints of trade

* Faccenda Chicken v Fowler [1985] 1 A11 ER 724

* NP Generations Pty Ltd v Feneley (2001) 80 SASR 151

* Wright v Gasweld Pty Ltd (1991) 22 NSWLR 317; (1991) 20 IPR 481 (NSW CA)

Woolworths Limited v Olson [2004] NSWCA (6 October 2004)

Bluescope Steel v Kelly [2007] FCA 517 (12 April 2007) at [88]-[90] regarding ‘know-how’

*Del Casale v Artedomus (Aust) Pty Ltd [2007] NSWCA 172 (18 July 2007)

7.  BUSINESS REPUTATION

Reading from Prescribed Materials

MSG 2004: Ch 16, 17, 18.

RR 2005: Ch 16

A.Passing off

(1)Origins of passing off

RR 2005 at 881-883

Reddaway v Banham [1896] AC 199

(2)Elements of the Action

*Erven Warnink v J Townsend & Sons (Hull) Limited [1979] AC 731 (MBG 2007 at 594; RR 2005 at 883-888)

Document info
Document views87
Page views87
Page last viewedTue Dec 06 22:42:35 UTC 2016
Pages31
Paragraphs1133
Words8078

Comments