X hits on this document

94 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

40 / 42

1-19

19.61

21.15

1.54

0.172

0.265

20-99

31.60

41.80

10.20

0.422

4.304

100+

39.59

57.32

17.73

0.406

7.198

Central City

33.14

44.04

10.90

0.312

3.401

Suburbs

30.49

44.60

14.11

0.688

9.708

% Firms Always Check

Difference In Checking

Proportion of Firms

Weighted Contribution

1992-94

2001

2001

36.10 14.59 45.32 21.15 26.64 46.67 39.91

28.57 33.02 51.52 20.59 46.09 59.38 50.93

-7.53 18.43 8.20 -0.56 19.45 12.71 11.02

0.034 0.171 0.053 0.055 0.186 0.052 0.435

-0.256 3.152 0.435 -0.031 3.618 0.661 4.794

49.02

58.33

9.31

0.240

2.234

60.75

65.15

4.40

0.213

0.937

38.72

46.47

7.75

0.221

1.713

25.31

39.29

13.98

0.779

10.890

40.08

47.97

12.72

0.189

2.404

23.32

35.04

11.72

0.811

9.504

30.06

38.60

8.54

0.347

2.963

33.39

47.52

14.13

0.653

9.227

Table 2 Percentage of Firms that Always Check Criminal Backgrounds of Applicants from 1992-94 to 2001

Industry Construction

Manufacturing Trans., Comm., and Utilities Wholesale Trade Retail Trade FIRE Service

Firm Size

Collective Bargaining

Not-for-Profit

Black Male Applicants High (> .10)

Black Male Applicants Low (0 - .10)

Black Female Applicants High (> .10)

Black Female Applicants Low (0 - .10)

Latino Applicants High (> .40)

Latino Applicants Low (0 - .40)

Document info
Document views94
Page views94
Page last viewedThu Dec 08 06:25:27 UTC 2016
Pages42
Paragraphs1251
Words9345

Comments