X hits on this document

143 views

0 shares

38 / 38

# Domination

As in a second-price auction, any player i’s action of bidding bi > vi is weakly dominated by the action of bidding vi:

• if the other players’ bids are such that player i loses when she bids bi, then it makes no difference to her whether she bids bi or vi

• if the other players’ bids are such that player i wins when she bids bi, then she gets a negative payoff bidding bi and a payoff of 0 when she bids vi.

However, in a first-price auction, unlike a second-price auction, a bid by a player less than her valuation is not weakly dominated.

R e a s o n : i f p l a y e r i b i d s v i < v i a n d t h e h i g h e s t b i d o f t h e o t h e r p l a y e r s i s < v i , t h e n p l a y e r i i s b e t t e r o ff t h a n s h e i s she bids vi. i f

# Revenue equivalence

The price at which the object is sold, and hence the auctioneer’s revenue, is the same in the equilibrium (v1, . . . , vn) of the second-price auction as it is in the equilibrium (v2, v2, v3, . . . , vn) of the first-price auction.

38

 Document views 143 Page views 143 Page last viewed Sun Jan 22 15:16:00 UTC 2017 Pages 38 Paragraphs 543 Words 4259