X hits on this document

PDF document

Searching for Google’s Value: - page 24 / 44





24 / 44

ante expected degree of underpricing as Ut =

t t t m i d µ µ ˆ ˆ

, where midt serves as a estimate of the expected

issue price and is defined to be the market capitalization computed from the midpoint of the announced

p r i c e r a n g e a n d t h e a n n o u n c e d s h a r e q u a n t i t i e s 3 0 a n d t µ ˆ i s t h e e x a n t e m a r k e t f o r e c a s t o f t h e p o s t - I P O

market value estimated from equation (3). We correlate this withσˆt , the ex ante market uncertainty

estimated from equation (3). From the date that the first initial price ranges and share quantities were

announced (with Amendment 4 on 7/26/04) through the IPO date (8/18/04), the correlation coefficient

was -0.62 (t = -2.56, p-value = 0.018). While this result is not strictly counter to Rock’s (1986)

prediction,31 it is indicative of a relationship between underpricing and uncertainty that would go in the

opposite direction of his model.

4. Evidence on Theories that Involve Discretionary Allocations of Shares or Pre-

commitment to IPO Prices

Further evidence on theory comes from Google’s unique auction mechanism. Benveniste and

Spindt (1989) and other models (e.g., Loughran and Ritter, 2002) rely on discretionary allocations of

shares by the investment banker. Some models rely on pre-commitment to underprice (e.g., Benveniste

and Spindt, 1989). Others rely on pre-commitment to a price, after which investors gather information

(e.g., Chemmanur, 1993). Because the auction mechanism severely restricted discretion in allocating

shares and determined the allowable maximum IPO price after bids were submitted, underpricing here is

evidence against models that rely on such factors. If these factors alone explained underpricing, we

should not have observed it in Google’s case.

30 Whether we use the midpoint, the upper end or the lower end makes no substantive difference to the results that follow. 31Again, his model would predict a positive cross-sectional correlation between ex ante uncertainty and average levels of ex post under pricing. Here, we show a positive time series correlation between ex ante uncertainty and ex ante forecasts of underpricing.


Document info
Document views162
Page views162
Page last viewedSun Jan 22 17:00:29 UTC 2017