X hits on this document

64 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

28 / 29

REfERENCES

Easterbrook, F. 1986. Monopoly, manipulation, and the regulation of futures markets. Journal of Business 59:S103-S127. Edwards, F. 1983. e clearing association in futures markets: Guarantor and regulator. Journal of Futures Markets 3: 369-392.

Froot, K, D. Scharfstein and J. Stein. 1993. Risk management: Co-ordinating corporate investment and nancing policies. Journal of Finance 48: 1629-1655.

Morris, A. 2009. “Equity and Eciency in Cap-and-Trade: Eectively Managing the Emissions Allowance Supply,” Energy Security Initiative Policy Brief 09-05. Washington, D.C.: e Brookings Institution.

Pirrong, C. 1995. e self-regulation of commodity exchanges: e case of market manipulation.” Journal of Law and Economics 38: 141-206.

Pirrong, C. 1996. e La , Economics, and Public Policy of Market Power Manipulation. Boston: Kluwer Academic Press.

Pirrong, C. 1997. e ineciency of US commodity manipulation law: A diagnosis and a proposed cure. Research in Law and Economics 18: 173-227.

Pirrong, C. 2004. Detecting manipulation in futures markets: e Ferruzzi soybean episode. American Law and Economics Review 4: 28-71.

Pirrong, C. 2008. “Rocket Science, Default Risk, and the Organization of Derivatives Markets,” Working Paper, University of Houston.

Pirrong, C. 2009. “Mutualization of Default Risk, Fungibility, and Moral hazard: e Economics of Default Risk Sharing in Cleared and Bilateral Markets,” Working paper, University of Houston.

Telser, L. 1981. Why there are organized futures markets. Journal of Law and Economics 24: 1-22.

United States Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 2007. Order to Show Cause and Notice of Proposed Penalties (“Amaranth Show Cause Order”).

United States Industrial Commission 1901. Report on the Distribution of Farm Products. United States Senate 1921. Hearings on the Futures Trading Act.

United States Senate 1928. Cotton Prices: Hearings Before a Subcommittee of the Senate Committee on Agriculture and Forestry, Pursuant to S. Res. 142, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. 220.

Williams, J. 1995. Manipulation on Trial: Economic Analysis and the Hunt Silver Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

MARkET

oVERSIGhT

foR

C A p - A N d -T R A d E :

E f f I C I E N T LY R E G U L AT I N G T h E C A R b o N d E R I VAT I V E S M A R k E T

24

Document info
Document views64
Page views64
Page last viewedSat Dec 03 22:05:40 UTC 2016
Pages29
Paragraphs455
Words12378

Comments