X hits on this document

33 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

2 / 7

plan. The sale was to close on May 28, 2003, in conjunction with the scheduled confirmation hearing on the debtor’s plan. At the confirmation hearing, counsel for Resort advised the parties that his client could not go through with the purchase. Wright also attended this hearing on behalf of Resort. Wright addressed the Court at length regarding Resort’s failure to close on the purchase. Because this sale was the sole means of implementing the debtor’s plan, the Court denied confirmation of the plan. More significantly, the debtor’s exclusivity period expired.

In the ensuing months, six different entities filed proposed reorganization plans to acquire the Property,2 leading to difficult procedural issues regarding soliciting votes for so many competing plans. One plan proponent was Perdido Key Realty, LLC. This was a limited liability company created by a company known as Strategica as a vehicle to

acquire the property.

Wright was

intimately

involved

with

Strategica.

Wright had contacted Strategica about

purchasing the Property. Strategica also promised him

For Wright’s efforts, an equity interest in the

purchasing 20, 2003,

entity, Perdido Key Realty. On the Court conducted a hearing

August to sort

through the any, would

six be

plans and determine sent to creditors for

which plan, if consideration.

Attorney Realty at

Nick Bangos represented Perdido Key this hearing. The Court deferred ruling on

which plan(s) would be sent to scheduled a follow up hearing to occur 2003.

creditors and on August 25,

Wright also attended the hearing on August 20, 2003. At this hearing, Wright first learned that WCI was a potential purchaser of the Property

pursuant partner,

to the plan submitted by the

Champion

Management

debtor’s limited Development

Company,

Inc.

(“Champion”).

After

the

hearing,

Wright

had

a

conversation

with

WCI’s

attorney,

John

Anthony, in which Wright advised Anthony Confidentiality Agreement with WCI.

of

his

2

Once the debtor’s exclusivity period expired, several

parties in interest filed acquire the Property.

their On

own June

plans in attempts to 18, 2003, Pinnacle

Communities, LLC filed its plan (Doc. No. 23, 2003, Champion filed its plan (Doc. August 8, 2003, Perdido Key Resort

173); on June No. 175); on Development

Company, LLC filed its plan (Doc. No. 2003, Perdido Key Realty, LLC filed

217); on August 8, its plan (Doc. No.

220); on Amended August 8, (Doc. No.

August 8, 2003, the debtor filed its Plan of Reorganization (Doc. No. 222); 2003, Advocate Investments, LLC filed 224).

Second and on its plan

2

By August 2003, both Thomas and Corelli, the two WCI representatives who had spoken to Wright about the Property, had found new jobs. There was no one then employed by WCI who had any knowledge of the Confidentiality Agreement or Wright’s involvement in the Property. Rather, Champion negotiated with WCI representatives who had never met Wright and had no information

regarding the Property. On sent Anthony a copy

August 22, 2003, Wright of the Confidentiality

Agreement. Key Realty’s

Wright also wrote a letter to attorney, Bangos, enclosing a

Perdido copy of

the

Confidentiality

Agreement,

expressing

his

belief

that

the

Confidentiality

Agreement

created

“severe

heartburn”

for

WCI,

asking

Bangos

to

respond

to

WCI’s

counsel,

and

stating

that

he

intended

to

attend

the his

next own

hearing scheduled for August correspondence, Wright knew

25, 2003. that WCI

By was

attempting to

acquire

the Property

from the

debtor.

Further, by

August

22, 2003,

WCI’s

current

terms

the

management also had actual knowledge of the Confidentiality Agreement.

of

At the hearing on August 25, 2003, the Court determined that only two plans would be sent to creditors—the plan proposed by Champion, which the debtor later supported and which proposed WCI would purchase the Property, and the plan proposed by Advocate Investments, which contemplated a public auction of the Property.

Champion then joined forces with the debtor’s general partner to file a Third Amended Plan which proposed a cash sale of the Property to WCI for $25 million. Wright had knowledge of the plan and WCI’s purchase offer.

The debtor also was aware of the existence of the Confidentiality Agreement between WCI and Wright well prior to the confirmation hearing. On September 26, 2003, Bangos sent an e-mail message to the debtor’s attorney advising him of Wright’s Confidentiality Agreement with WCI and specifically threatening to file an action for injunctive relief to stop the sale to WCI. Bangos also wrote to Jay Enis, a principal at Strategica, and informed him of Wright’s Confidentiality Agreement and recognized that enforcing the agreement would require “break- neck speed” in the needed litigation. Clearly, Bangos recognized that immediate litigation was needed u n d e r t h e C o n f i d e n t i a l i t y A g r e e m e n t , i n o r d e r t o s t o p However, neither Wright nor the sale to WCI.

Strategica hired Bangos or any other lawyer to pursue this litigation or otherwise to challenge WCI’s purchase of the Property.

On October 9, 2003, the Court held a confirmation hearing to consider the competing

Document info
Document views33
Page views33
Page last viewedSat Dec 10 09:41:56 UTC 2016
Pages7
Paragraphs723
Words5313

Comments