X hits on this document

Word document

Modernizing General Chemistry for the Year 2050: Why Are General Chemistry - page 13 / 13

49 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

13 / 13

References

Bunce, D.M. and Hutchinson, K.D. (1993). The Use of the GALT (Group Assessment of Logical Thinking) as a Predictor of Academic Success in College Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education 70 (3), 183 – 186.

diSessa, A. (1988) in Constructivism in the Computer Age, Forman, G. and Pufall, P.B., Eds. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ. pp. 49 – 70.

diSessa, A. and Sherin, B. (1998). What changes in conceptual change? International Journal of Science Education, 20 (10), 1155-1191.

Dori, Y.J. and Barak, M. (2003). A Web-Based Chemistry Course as a Means to Foster Freshman Learning. Journal of Chemical Education 80 (9), 1084 – 1092.

Eshach, H. and Garik, P. (2001). Differences Between Novices’ and Experts’ Mental Models of Atomic Electronic Structure. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association 2002, New Orleans, LA.

Handelsman, J, Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A., DeHaan, R., Gentile, J., Lauffer, S., Stewart, J., Tilghman, S.M., & Wood, W.B. (2004) Scientific Teaching. Science 304, 521 – 522.

Kirkwood, V. and Symington, D. (1996). Lecturer Perceptions of Student Difficulties in a First-Year Chemistry Course. Journal of Chemical Education 73(4), 339 – 343.

Kuhn, Thomas (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Second Edition, Enlarged. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, Illinois.

National Research Council (1999). How People Learn, Brandsford, J.D., Brown, A.L. and Cocking, R. R. Eds., National Academy Press: Washington, D.C.

Garik & Kelley (draft)page 13

NARST 2005

Document info
Document views49
Page views50
Page last viewedFri Dec 02 22:59:36 UTC 2016
Pages13
Paragraphs319
Words6174

Comments