X hits on this document

231 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

40 / 108

SESSION 1: SELECTING SQG INDICATORS

8

7

7

6

5

5

5

5

4

4

4

4

4

3

3

3

3

2

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

Containers Labeled

Containers Closed

Containers in Good Conditio

Container Management (Roll-up Questio Impervious Surface

Inspection of HW Storage Area Aisle distance / spacing

Secondary Containment Areas - New York O

Timeliness Thresholds

Proper Disposal of HW

Quantity Thresholds

HW Determinations

HW Generator Classification

Employee Training

Emergency Info Posted

Emergency Response

P2

Local Authority

Compliance Assessments

The Project Management Team used this data to develop an exercise where states were asked to compare indicator language submitted by each state to identify common characteristics, potential gaps and quality issues that needed to be addressed. Once the language was reviewed, states were asked to either “accept” or “reject” the indicator category. See Exhibit 2.1 which shows each state’s SQG indicator language related to the container management category.

The States Common Measures Project Final Report

40

Document info
Document views231
Page views231
Page last viewedSun Dec 04 12:33:21 UTC 2016
Pages108
Paragraphs3821
Words29990

Comments