X hits on this document

302 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

65 / 108

Observed SQG achievement rates for the individual regulatory indicators were relatively consistent across states. The greatest variation occurred with Indicator 3: Containers Properly Labeled, Indicator 4: Containers Closed and Indicator 10: Emergency Response Information Posted:

States Common Measures Project Observed State SQG Achievement Rates on Regulatory Indicators

100%

80%

% of Sample Achieving

60%

40%

Connecticut (38)

Connecticut (38)

Connecticut (38)

Connecticut (38)

Connecticut (38)

Connecticut (38)

Connecticut (38)

Connecticut (38)

20%

Indicator 3) containers

Indicator 4) containers closed

Indicator 5) containers in

Indicator 6*) accumulation

Indicator 7) accumulation

Indicator 8) manifests used

Indicator 9) hazardous waste

Indicator 10) emergency

properly labeled

good condition

quantity limits followed

time limits followed

streams identified

response information posted

76.4%

76.4%

100.0%

100.0%

96.0%

100.0%

90.9%

63.2%

81.6%

86.8%

97.4%

100.0%

100.0%

97.4%

89.5%

92.1%

78.2%

89.1%

100.0%

100.0%

87.0%

100.0%

100.0%

90.9%

67.0%

88.0%

98.1%

98.1%

96.0%

96.2%

94.4%

64.8%

84.0%

76.0%

98.0%

89.1%

100.0%

94.1%

74.5%

64.3%

83.9%

100.0%

97.0%

92.0%

98.2%

86.0%

38.6%

65.0%

87.5%

95.0%

93.2%

93.0%

95.5%

90.9%

65.1%

90.0%

90.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

86.4%

86.4%

0%

Colorado (57) Connecticut (38) Maine (55) Massachusetts (54) New Hampshire (51) New York (57) Vermont (44) Rhode Island (22)

  • *

    Indicator 6 does not apply to RI or NH

#s in parentheses indicate # of facilities included in the state's sample

The States Common Measures Project Final Report

65

Document info
Document views302
Page views302
Page last viewedSat Dec 10 21:36:25 UTC 2016
Pages108
Paragraphs3821
Words29990

Comments