X hits on this document

326 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

69 / 108

Using the “All Indicators” chart above as an example:

    • Rhode Island and Maine’s SQG mean facility scores were statistically significantly higher than Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Colorado and New York.

    • Vermont and Massachusetts’ SQG mean facility scores were statistically significantly higher than Connecticut, Colorado and New York.

    • New Hampshire’s SQG mean facility scores were statistically significantly higher than Colorado and New York.

      • 4.3.3

        Statistically Significance Differences in State SQG Achievement Rates for

Individual Indicators

Exhibit 4.2 below presents statistically significant differences in achievement rates across all participating states by individual regulatory indicators. There were no statistically significant differences in achievement rates for indicators 4, 5 and 8.

The States Common Measures Project Final Report

69

Document info
Document views326
Page views326
Page last viewedTue Jan 17 22:00:33 UTC 2017
Pages108
Paragraphs3821
Words29990

Comments