X hits on this document

227 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

71 / 108

RI

16

87.5%

68.4% - 95.8%

RI

16

68.8%

48.2% - 83.9%

ME

55

81.8%

71.8% - 88.8%

MA

54

44.4%

33.9% - 55.6%

VT

44

84.1%

73.1% - 91.1%

ME

55

38.2%

28.2% - 49.3%

NH

51

78.4%

67.7% - 86.3%

NH

50

32.0%

22.3% - 43.5%

MA

54

72.2%

61.3% - 81.0%

VT

44

31.8%

21.6% - 44.1%

NY

56

48.2%

37.6% - 59.0%

NY

56

17.9%

11.0% - 27.7%

CT

38

47.4%

34.7% - 60.4%

CO

57

14.0%

8.1% - 23.3%

CO

57

40.4%

30.3% - 51.2%

CT

38

2.6%

0.6% - 11.0%

VT

43

69.8%

57.4% - 79.8%

ME

55

69.1%

58.1% - 78.2%

ME

55

67.3%

56.3% - 76.7%

RI

15

66.7%

45.5% - 82.7%

RI

11

56.3%

36.5% - 74.2%

NH

50

66.0%

54.4% - 75.9%

MA

54

51.9%

40.8% - 62.7%

VT

44

63.6%

51.2% - 74.5%

NH

50

48.0%

36.8% - 59.4%

MA

53

45.3%

34.5% - 56.5%

CT

38

28.9%

18.6% - 42.1%

NY

56

37.5%

27.7% - 48.5%

NY

56

28.6%

19.8% - 39.3%

CT

38

26.3%

16.4% - 39.4%

CO

53

28.1%

19.4% - 38.7%

CO

57

14.0%

8.1% - 23.2%

Exhibit 4.3 below presents statistically significant differences in achievement rates across all participating states by individual beyond compliance indicators.

Note: Arrows extending from one state to another indicate a statistically significant difference between the two states at a 90% confidence level. The lack of an arrow between any two states means the observed differences may be due to chance.

Indicator 11a (Toxics use reduction implemented)

Indicator 11d implemented)

(Energy conservation/Alternative energy

ME

55

70.9%

60.0% - 79.8%

RI

14

64.3%

42.6% - 81.4%

VT

44

63.6%

51.2% - 74.5%

NH

50

52.0%

40.6% - 63.2%

MA

54

46.3%

35.6% - 57.4%

NY

56

23.2%

15.3% - 33.6%

CO

57

21.1%

13.6% - 31.1%

CT

38

21.1%

12.3% - 33.7%

Exhibit 4.3 Statistically Significance Differences in State SQG Achievement Rates for Beyond Compliance Indicators

STATE

# Facilities

Observed Achievement Rate

Confidence Interval (90% confidence level)

Indicator 11 (Any reduction or conservation measures conducted over past 3 yrs)

Indicator 11c

(Water conservation implemented)

Indicator 11b (Recycling projects undertaken)

Observed

Confidence Interval

Achievement

(90% confidence

Rate

level)

STATE

  • #

    Facilities

The States Common Measures Project Final Report

71

Document info
Document views227
Page views227
Page last viewedSat Dec 03 20:39:07 UTC 2016
Pages108
Paragraphs3821
Words29990

Comments