X hits on this document

297 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

84 / 108

    • o

      The data does not appear to support a relationship between who conducted the inspections and the measured SQG performance.

  • 6)

    Did the Type of SQG Enforcement Actions between June 2004 and June 2007 Influence Performance?

Typical SQG “Enforcement” Actions

(June 2004 – June 2007)

CO CT

Compliance Advisories (informal enforcement) and Penalties

Warning Letters, Notices of Violation, Consent Orders

MA ME

Notices of Non-compliance, Orders and Penalties

Informal enforcement including Letter of Warning (LOWs), and Notice of Violation (NOVs), and Formal enforcement including Consent Agreements (CAs) and formal legal actions civil and criminal actions.

NH NY RI VT

Warning Letters, Notice of Non-Compliance, Consent Orders

Notices of Violation (informal), Consent Orders

Letters of Non-C ompliance, Formal Enforcement

Notice of Alleged Violation Letters, Formal Enforcement

  • o

    The data do not appear to support a relationship between the type of

enforcement actions and the measured SQG performance.

The States Common Measures Project Final Report

84

Document info
Document views297
Page views297
Page last viewedSat Dec 10 19:16:40 UTC 2016
Pages108
Paragraphs3821
Words29990

Comments