X hits on this document

252 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

87 / 108

4.5 EXPLORATION OF POSSIBLE AREAS OF BIAS IN SQG PERFORMANCE RESULTS

1) Did SQGs in States with Lower Accumulation Quantity Limits or Shorter Accumulation Time Limits Have Poorer Performance?

State

Accumulation Quantity Limit

Accumulation Time Limit

CO

6000 kg

180 or 270 (if >200 mi from TSDF

CT

1000 kg

180 days

MA

6000 kg

180 days

ME

3000 kg

90 days

NH

NA

90 days

NY

6000 kg

180 days

RI

NA

90 days

VT

6000 kg

180 days

Project SQG Generation Rate

100 - 1000 kg / month

100 - 1000 kg / month 100 - 1000 kg / month 100 - 1000 kg / month 100 - 1000 kg / month 100 - 1000 kg / month 100 - 1000 kg / month 100 - 1000 kg / month

Accumulation Time Limit:

  • Three states [ME, NH, RI] had stricter accumulation time limits

  • ME and NH had the two lowest SQG achievement rates for indicator 7: accumulation time limits followed.

  • CT’s SQG achievement rate was statistically significantly higher than NH’s and ME’s SQG achievement rates.

  • CO’s SQG achievement rate was statistically significantly higher than ME’s SQG achievement rate.

  • RI has an observed SQG achievement rate of 100% on indicator 7: accumulation time limits followed.

  • o

    Based on the mixed results, this area may warrant further evaluation.

The States Common Measures Project Final Report

87

Document info
Document views252
Page views252
Page last viewedTue Dec 06 19:01:52 UTC 2016
Pages108
Paragraphs3821
Words29990

Comments