X hits on this document

PDF document

Mattresses%20for%20Decubitus%20Ulcer%20Prevention%20Clinical%20and%20Cost-Effectiveness.pdf - page 9 / 10

46 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

9 / 10

  • 14.

    Sanada H, Sugama J, Matsui Y, Konya C, Kitagawa A, Okuwa M, et al. Randomised controlled trial to evaluate a new double-layer air-cell overlay for elderly patients requiring head elevation. J Tissue Viability 2003;13(3):112-4, 116, 118.

  • 15.

    Russell JA, Lichtenstein SL. Randomized controlled trial to determine the safety and efficacy of a multi-cell pulsating dynamic mattress system in the prevention of pressure ulcers in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery. Ostomy Wound Manage 2000;46(2):46-5.

  • 16.

    Keogh A, Dealey C. Profiling beds versus standard hospital beds: effects on pressure ulcer incidence outcomes. J Wound Care 2001;10(2):15-9.

  • 17.

    Gunningberg L, Lindholm C, Carlsson M, Sjoden PO. Effect of visco-elastic foam mattresses on the development of pressure ulcers in patients with hip fractures. J Wound Care 2000;9(10):455-60.

  • 18.

    Gray DG, Smith M. Comparison of a new foam mattress with the standard hospital mattress. J Wound Care 2000;9(1):29-31.

  • 19.

    Berthe JV, Bustillo A, Mélot C, de FS. Does a foamy-block mattress system prevent pressure sores ? A prospective randomised clinical trial in 1729 patients. Acta Chir Belg 2007;107(2):155-61.

  • 20.

    Russell L, Reynolds TM, Towns A, Worth W, Greenman A, Turner R. Randomized comparison trial of the RIK and the Nimbus 3 mattresses. Br J Nurs 2003;12(4):254-6-259.

  • 21.

    Hoskins A. Alternating pressure mattresses were more cost effective than alternating pressure overlays for preventing pressure ulcers. Evid Based Nurs 2007;10(1):23.

  • 22.

    Iglesias C, Nixon J, Cranny G, Nelson EA, Hawkins K, Phillips A, et al. Pressure relieving support surfaces (PRESSURE) trial: cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ 2006;332(7555):1416.

  • 23.

    Catz A, Zifroni A, Philo O. Economic assessment of pressure sore prevention using a computerized mattress system in patients with spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27(21):1315-9.

  • 24.

    Clark M. Changing pressure-redistributing mattress stocks: costs and outcomes. Br J Nurs 2005;14(6):S30-S32 (accessed 2007 Dec 10).

  • 25.

    Fleurence RL. Cost-effectiveness of pressure-relieving devices for the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2005;21(3):334-41.

  • 26.

    Legood R, McInnes E. Pressure ulcers: guideline development and economic modelling. J Adv Nurs 2005;50(3):307-14.

  • 27.

    Gebhardt KS. Cost-effective management of pressure-relieving equipment in a large teaching trust. J Tissue Viability 2003;13(2):74-7.

Specialty Mattresses for Prevention of PUs in Acute and Critical Care

9

Document info
Document views46
Page views46
Page last viewedFri Dec 09 04:58:43 UTC 2016
Pages10
Paragraphs152
Words4379

Comments