X hits on this document





16 / 26


CFG/RBS Comments

Q 34: For purposes of determining EAD for counterparty credit risk and recognizing collateral mitigating that risk, the proposed rule allows banks to take into account only financial collateral, which, by definition, does not include debt securities that have an external rating lower than one rating category below investment grade. The agencies invite comment on the extent to which lower-rated debt securities or other securities that do not meet the definition of financial collateral are used in these transactions and on the CRM value of such securities.

If firms retain the seniority and material value exists for recovery, lower rated debt securities should be recognized as collateral in the determination of EAD for counterparty credit risk.

Q 35: The agencies recognize that criterion (iii) above may pose challenges for certain transactions that would not be eligible for certain exemptions from bankruptcy or receivership laws because the counterparty—for example, a sovereign entity or a pension fund—is not subject to such laws. The agencies seek comment on ways this criterion could be crafted to accommodate such transactions when justified on prudential grounds, while ensuring that the requirements in criterion (iii) are met for transactions that are eligible for those exemptions.

No comment.

Q 36: The agencies seek comment on the appropriateness of requiring that a bank have a perfected, first priority security interest, or the legal equivalent thereof, in the definition of financial collateral.

The definition of financial collateral is too restrictive. Banks should be allowed to include second or lower priority interests as long as material recoveries to offset the potential losses exist.


Document info
Document views45
Page views45
Page last viewedThu Oct 27 03:45:23 UTC 2016