X hits on this document

134 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

35 / 40

Templeton Emerging Markets Fund

Shareholder Information (continued)

Board Review of Investment Management Agreement (continued)

event of a natural disaster, it being noted that such systems and procedures had functioned smoothly during the Florida hurricanes and blackouts experienced in previous years. Among other factors taken into account by the Board were the Manager’s best execution trading policies, including a favorable report by an independent portfolio trading analytical firm. Consideration was also given to the experience of the Fund’s portfolio management team, the number of accounts managed and general method of compensation. In this latter respect, the Board noted that a primary factor in management’s determination of the level of a portfolio manager’s bonus compensation was the relative investment performance of the funds he or she managed and that a portion of such bonus was required to be invested in a predesignated list of funds within such person’s fund management area so as to be aligned with the interests of shareholders. Particular attention was given to man- agement’s conservative approach and diligent risk management procedures, including continuous monitoring of counterparty credit risk and attention given to derivatives and other complex instruments. The Board also took into account, among other things, the strong financial position of the Manager’s parent company and its commitment to the fund business as evidenced by its subsidization of money market funds.

INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE. The Board placed significant emphasis on the investment performance of the Fund in view of its importance to shareholders. While consideration was given to performance reports and discussions with portfolio managers at Board meetings during the year, particular attention in assessing performance was given to the Lipper reports furnished for the agreement renewal. The Lipper report for the Fund showed its investment performance for the one-year period ended February 28, 2011, as well as the previous 10 years ended that date in comparison to a performance universe consisting of the Fund and all other closed-end, nonleveraged, emerging markets funds as selected by Lipper. Such report considers total return on a net asset value basis without regard to market discounts or premiums to accurately reflect investment performance. On a comparative basis, the Lipper report showed the Fund’s total return for the one-year period to be in the second-highest quintile of the performance universe, and on an annualized basis to be in the highest or best performing quintile of such universe for the previous three- and five-year periods, and the second-highest quintile of such universe for the previous 10-year period. The Board was satisfied with such comparative performance.

COMPARATIVE EXPENSES. Consideration was given to a comparative analysis of the manage- ment fee and total expense ratio of the Fund compared with those of a group of other funds selected by Lipper as its appropriate Lipper expense group. Lipper expense data is based upon information taken from each fund’s most recent annual report, which reflects historical asset levels that may be quite different from those currently existing, particularly in a period of market volatility. While recognizing such inherent limitation and the fact that expense ratios generally increase as assets decline and decrease as assets grow, the Board believed the independent analysis conducted by Lipper to be an appropriate measure of comparative expenses. In reviewing comparative costs, Lipper provides information on the Fund’s investment contractual management fee rate in comparison with the investment contractual management fee rate that would have been charged by the other

Annual Report | 33

Document info
Document views134
Page views134
Page last viewedSun Dec 11 01:02:31 UTC 2016
Pages40
Paragraphs2247
Words18169

Comments