X hits on this document

PDF document

04-16614-frm_Margaret%20M%20Thompson_2006-09-12%2010;05;01.pdf - page 14 / 14

42 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

14 / 14

merely duplicates the Merediths’ claim and should be disallowed. See In re Morton, 1993 WL

13152213 (Bankr. E.D. Va. Aug. 9, 1993)(Section 502(e) “requires disallowance of the claim for

. . .contribution of a co-debtor. . .unless the claim of the creditor has been paid in full.”) Further,

allowing Kentor’s claim for contribution could result in a windfall to him as he might receive

payment but not use those funds to pay the Merediths.

Conclusion

Kentor’s asserted contingent right of contribution under the Meredith Loan gives him

standing to pursue his Complaint Objecting to Discharge against Dr. Thompson. All claims listed

in Kentor’s proof of claim are disallowed for the reasons stated above. Orders of evendate herewith

will be entered.

###

14

Document info
Document views42
Page views42
Page last viewedFri Dec 09 08:26:27 UTC 2016
Pages14
Paragraphs325
Words4370

Comments