X hits on this document

33 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

5 / 6

    • 3.

      National Research Council, Elder Mistreatment: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation in an Aging America. (National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2003).

    • 4.

      National Center on Elder Abuse, Fact Sheet: Elder Abuse Prevalence and Incidence (NCEA, Washington, D.C., 2005), avail- able at www.elderabusecenter.org.

    • 5.

      Clearinghouse on Abuse and Neglect of the Elderly, Annotated Bibliography: Elder Abuse, a Global Issue (2002), available at www.elderabusecenter.org.

    • 6.

      Clearinghouse on Abuse and Neglect of the Elderly, Annotated Bibliography: Cultural Issues in Elder Abuse (2002), available at www.elderabusecenter.org.

    • 7.

      G.J. Jogerst, J.M. Daly, M.F. Brinig, et al., Domestic Elder Abuse and the Law, 93 Am. J. Public Health 2131–36 (2003).

    • 8.

      National Research Council, supra note 3, at 1.

    • 9.

      G.J. Anetzberger, Caregiving: Primary Cause of Elder Abuse? XXIV Generations 46–51 (Summer 2000).

  • 10.

    K.B. Dreher, Enforcement of Standards of Care in the Long-Term Care Industry: How Far Have We Come and Where Do We Go From Here?, 10 Elder L.J. 119 (2002).

  • 11.

    S. Loue, Elder Abuse and Neglect in Medicine and Law: The Need for Reform, 22 J. Legal Med. 159–209 (2001).

  • 12.

    C. Dyer & A.M, Goins, The Role of the Interdisciplinary Geriatric Assessment in Addressing Self-Neglect of the Elderly, XXIV Generations 23–27 (Summer 2000).

  • 13.

    42 Code of Federal Regulations §§483.10, 483.15, 483.25.

  • 14.

    E.M. Myers, Physical Restraints in Nursing Homes: Analysis of Quality of Care and Legal Liability, 10 Elder L.J. 217–62 (2002).

  • 15.

    Dreher, supra note 10.

  • 16.

    J.B. Breaux & O.B. Hatch, Confronting Elder Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation: The Need for Elder Justice Legislation, 11 Elder L.J. 207–71 (2003).

  • 17.

    S. Moskowitz, Contemporary Legal Developments in Elder Abuse and Neglect, 36 Loyola L.A. L. Rev. 589–666 (2003).

  • 18.

    Id.

  • 19.

    R.J. Koenig & C.R. DeGuerre, The Legal and Governmental Response to Domestic Elder Abuse, 21 Clin. Geriatr. Med. 383–98

(2005)

  • 20.

    T. Grisso & P.S. Appelbaum, Assessing Competence to Consent to Treatment (Oxford University Press, New York, 1998).

  • 21.

    I. Doron, Elder Guardianship Kaleidoscope: A Comparative Perspective, 16 Int. l J. of Law, Pol’y and the Family 368–98

    • (2002)

      .

  • 22.

    M.J. Quinn, Guardianship of Adults: Achieving Justice, Autonomy, and Safety (Springer Publishing Company, New York, 2005).

  • 23.

    S.L. Reynolds, Guardianship Primavera: A First Look at Factors Associated with Having a Legal Guardian Using a Nationally Representative Sample of Community-Dwelling Adults, 6 Aging & Mental Health 109–20 (2002).

  • 24.

    J.L. Wright, Protecting Who from What, and Why, and How? A Proposal for an Integrative Approach to Adult Protective Proceedings, 12 Elder L.J. 53–118 (2004).

Endnotes 563

  • 25.

    United States General Accounting Office, Guardianships: Collaboration Needed to Protect Incapacitated Elderly People, GAO- 04-655 (GAO, Washington, D.C., 2004).

  • 26.

    F.A. Frolik, Promoting Judicial Acceptance and Use of Limited Guardianship, 31 Stetson L. Rev. 735–55 (2002).

  • 27.

    S.B. Hardin & Y.A. Yusufaly, Difficult End-of-Life Treatment Decisions, 164 Arch. Intern. Med. 1531–33 (2004).

  • 28.

    American Bar Association, Commission on Law and Aging, Incapacitated and Alone: Health Care Decision-Making for the Unbefriended Elderly (ABA, Washington, D.C., 2004).

  • 29.

    M.B. Kapp (ed.), Issues in Conducting Research With and About Older Persons, Vol. 8, Ethics, Law, and Aging Review (Springer Publishing Company, New York, 2002).

  • 30.

    R. Dresser, Dementia Research: Ethics and Policy for the Twenty- First Century, 35 Georgia L. Rev. 661–90 (2001).

  • 31.

    R. Gatter, Walking the Talk of Trust in Human Subjects Research: The Challenge of Regulating Financial Conflicts of Interest, 52 Emory L.J. 327–401 (2003).

  • 32.

    45 Code of Federal Regulations §46.116 and 21 Code of Federal Regulations §50.20.

  • 33.

    45 Code of Federal Regulations §46.102(d) and 21 Code of Federal Regulations §50.3(m).

  • 34.

    M.B. Kapp, Protecting Human Participants in Long-Term Care Research: The Role of State Law and Policy, 16 J. Aging & Social Pol’y 13–33 (2004).

  • 35.

    United States Congress, Congressional Budget Office, Financing Long-Term Care for the Elderly (CBO, Washington, D.C., 2004).

  • 36.

    B. Burns, Understanding Long-Term Care Insurance (Center for Medicare Education, Washington, D.C., 2004), available at www.MedicareEd.org.

3 7 . H e n r y J . K a i s e r F a m i l y F o u n d a t i o n , F a c t S h e e t : M e d i c a r e a t a available at Glance (Author, www.kff.org. Menlo Park, 2005), CA,

38. Public Law No. 105-33 (1997).

  • 39.

    Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Fact Sheet: Medicare Advantage (Author, Menlo Park, CA, 2005), available at www.kff.org.

  • 40.

    Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Fact Sheet: Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit (Author, Menlo Park, CA, 2005), avail- able at www.kff.org.

  • 41.

    D. Callahan, Setting Limits: Medical Goals in an Aging Society (Simon & Schuster, New York, 1987).

  • 42.

    M.B. Kapp, Health Care Rationing Affecting Older Persons: Rejected in Principle But Implemented in Fact, 14 J. Aging & Social Pol’y 27–42 (2002).

  • 43.

    L.A. Frolik, The Developing Field of Elder Law Redux: Ten Years After, 10 Elder L.J. 1–14 (2002).

  • 44.

    National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys, at www.naela.org.

  • 45.

    M.B. Kapp, Advocacy in an Aging Society: The Varied Roles of Attorneys, XXVIII Generations 31–35 (Spring 2004).

Document info
Document views33
Page views33
Page last viewedMon Dec 05 09:06:26 UTC 2016
Pages6
Paragraphs155
Words4366

Comments