X hits on this document

PDF document






9 / 17

00:28:00 DILJEET K. SINGH, M.D.: And it sort of brings us back to the issue of what makes this different than standard laparoscopy. That's a move in that specific way that we actually can't do, that takes two tools to try to mimic that kind of procedure with instruments that don't have the same kind of mobility. We have a couple more emailed in questions that I think are good questions. One of the questions sounds like it might be coming from somebody pretty familiar with uterine cancer, asking about concerns about using the uterine manipulator with and obturator in a cancer case and concerns about sealing the fallopian tubes. That's something that even in open surgery has essentially gone out of practice and sort of out of our beliefs about endometrial cancer, the concept that we could spread endometrial cancer out through the uterus, out in the fallopian tubes during the procedure, I think is pretty much no longer believed. I assume you agree with that Dr. Tillmann? 00:28:55 TODD D. TILLMANNS, M.D.: Yeah, I think there are people who still routinely practice and it's a simple thing to do if you want to just coagulate the fallopian tubes at the beginning of the case and if it does bother you, if it doesn't, like you suggested, for a lot of especially gynecologic oncologists and others, then you don't concern yourself too much with it, but if it was a bothersome part, you just cauterize the fallopian tubes and then place your uterine manipulator. I think that that's an easy way to address that, but a good question for sure. 00:29:24 DILJEET K. SINGH, M.D.: Sounds like we have some questions about complications during robotics versus traditional laparoscopic surgery. 00:29:30 TODD D. TILLMANNS, M.D.: I think that's another good question. Some of this data was just presented at that meeting as well. For standard hysterectomy, for instance, in the collaborative group that Dr. Lowe is part of, the had 261 hysterectomies and intraoperative complications occurred in 2.7 percent of the patients, which is actually lower than a lot of other procedures that we find. The estimated blood loss was low, as we stated before. Most of those complications were generally urinary type complications if we had them. Interestingly enough, the conversion rates are actually quite low. 00:30:14 DILJEET K. SINGH, M.D.: Sort of when we think about converting from having a laparoscopic procedure to an open procedure. 00:30:19 TODD D. TILLMANNS, M.D.: Exactly. Which is always a concern. If you start off laparoscopically, you'd like to be able to finish that way, and those rates are actually very low, in range of about two to three percent with the robot, which is much lower than was previously described. Let's see here. We have some other questions here. Let me just get those back again. 00:30:42 DILJEET K. SINGH, M.D.: We're sort of still watching now. Dr. Lowe briefly mentioned the fact that he was mentioning the patient's anatomy. I think the other thing that we have to just take a moment to do is thank our patient who was interested in educating people and willing to have participated in this webcast. Looks like we had another question. There we go. I'm not sure if this is also coming from a surgeon, but asking about the transition from the operating room in person to operating on a robot remotely. Again, you're still in the operating room and so I think as a surgeon, because if you're literally sitting right next to the operative field, you set up the robot, you bring in

Document info
Document views36
Page views36
Page last viewedSat Oct 22 13:51:39 UTC 2016