(emphasis in original). In other words, to survive the Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiffs here must
factually allege that Defendant Commonwealth Land itself is the “person” who participated in and
perpetuated a separate and distinct fraudulent enterprise.
Plaintiffs claim that the enterprise here consists of a combination of Commonwealth Land
and the title/settlement agents and that each “member of the Enterprise performs a role in the group
consistent with its organizational structure which furthers the activities of the Enterprise to market
and sell title insurance.” (Pl. Am. Compl. ¶59.)7 Plaintiffs allege that Commonwealth Land acted
through a network of title agents with whom Defendant contracted. (Id. at ¶60.) These title agents
are independent and distinct entities and individuals. In the TIRBOP Manual, “agent” is described
as “a person, firm, association, corporation, partnership, cooperative or joint stock company
expressly authorized by written contract with an Insurer to solicit risks, collect fees, and prepare
Commitments and/or title insurance policies on its behalf and certified by the Insurance Department
of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.” § 1.3. The title agents are not employees of Defendant,
but rather they are non-exclusive agents who work with different title insurance companies.
Although title agents have an agency agreement with Commonwealth Land, they are still separate,
independent entities who do not function as subsidiaries or employees of Commonwealth Land.
7 If Plaintiffs’ claim was that the enterprise consisted of a defendant corporation in association with its own employees or representatives, Defendant would be correct that the RICO count would fail for lack of distinctiveness. See R.R. Brittingham, 943 F.2d at 301 (finding that the distinctiveness requirement would be eviscerated if plaintiffs were allowed to plead an enterprise consisting of a corporation and its own employees or agents acting on its behalf). The enterprise here consisting of the combination of the title insurance company and the independent title agents is factually different from the enterprise described in Brittingham.