X hits on this document

37 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

4 / 19

Nowhere in the Plan does it require, mention or refer to objective evidence as

being necessary to establish entitlement to disability benefits.

Ms. Wolf, through her attorney, appealed the decision denying benefits and

submitted an additional report from Dr. Maser which clarified his previous statements to

Delta9 regarding Ms. Wolf’s ability to work. The letter stated, in part:

“At this particular time she will remain on temporary total disability. I am going to see her for reevaluation in July 1995. Until that time, I’ve recommended she do very minimal activities other than those she can do around the house.”

Delta did not immediately reinstate Ms. Wolf’s benefits in contrast to its actions

to terminate benefits when it received adverse information regarding total disability.

Instead, Delta scheduled Ms. Wolf’s claim for “review10.” In support of her appeal, Ms.

Wolf, through her attorney, submitted an additional report11 from Alphonso Petti, M.D. in

which he opined:

“Status post spinal surgery instrumentation and bone grafting for which she has a 15% impairment of the body and degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine.”

Dr. Maser examined Ms. Wolf and authored a report dated July 6, 199512. This

report consisted of several opinions and conclusions regarding Ms. Wolf’s disability

status13.

“She presented today and in actuality is worse off now than she has been in the past . . . I don’t think that we’re going to note any more improvement . . . As a result of this I think she has reached maximum medical improvement . . . [M]y personal feeling at this time is that she will

9

The May 10, 1995 appeal with the April 28, 1995 attachment from Dr. Maser is attached as composite

10 11 12 13

. The June 1, 1995 letter is attached as

.

The July 6, 1995 letter with attachment from Dr. Petti is attached as composite

.

Dr. Maser’s July 6, 1995 letter and report is attached as

.

Dr. Maser also stated that he intended to have a functional capacity evaluation performed on Ms. Wolf as

well as a

.

4

Document info
Document views37
Page views37
Page last viewedSun Dec 04 02:44:05 UTC 2016
Pages19
Paragraphs415
Words6158

Comments