X hits on this document

PDF document

Coated Free Sheet Paper From China, Indonesia, and Korea - page 136 / 198

835 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

136 / 198

sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

68538

Federal Register /

Vol. 71, No. 227 / Monday, November

27, 2006 / Notices

of the domestic industry because the petitioner is an interested party as defined in section 771(9)(C) of the Act, and has demonstrated sufficient industry support with respect to the antidumping investigations that the petitioner is requesting that the Department initiate (see ‘‘Determination of Industry Support for the Petition’’ below).

Scope of Investigations

The merchandise covered by each of these investigations includes coated free sheet paper and paperboard of a kind used for writing, printing or other graphic purposes. Coated free sheet paper is produced from not-more-than 10 percent by weight mechanical or combined chemical/mechanical fibers. Coated free sheet paper is coated with kaolin (China clay) or other inorganic substances, with or without a binder, and with no other coating. Coated free sheet paper may be surface-colored, surface-decorated, printed (except as described below), embossed, or perforated. The subject merchandise includes single- and double-side-coated free sheet paper; coated free sheet paper in both sheet or roll form; and is inclusive of all weights, brightness levels, and finishes. The terms ‘‘wood free’’ or ‘‘art’’ paper may also be used to describe the imported product.

Excluded from the scope are: (1) Coated free sheet paper that is imported printed with final content printed text or graphics; (2) base paper to be sensitized for use in photography; and (3) paper containing by weight 25 percent or more cotton fiber.

Coated free sheet paper is classifiable under subheadings 4810.13.1900,

      • 4810.13.2010

        , 4810.13.2090,

      • 4810.13.5000

        , 4810.13.7040,

      • 4810.14.1900

        , 4810.14.2010,

      • 4810.14.2090

        , 4810.14.5000,

      • 4810.14.7040

        , 4810.19.1900,

      • 4810.19.2010

        , and 4810.19.2090 of the

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the scope of these investigations is dispositive.

Comments on Scope of Investigations

During our review of the petitions, we discussed the scope with the petitioner to ensure that it is an accurate reflection of the products for which the domestic industry is seeking relief. Moreover, as discussed in the preamble to the regulations (Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties; Final Rule, 62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997)), we are setting aside a period for interested parties to raise issues regarding product

coverage. The Department encourages all interested parties to submit such comments within 20 calendar days of the publication of this notice. Comments should be addressed to Import Administrations Central Records Unit (CRU), Room 1870, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230. The period of scope consultations is intended to provide the Department with ample opportunity to consider all comments and to consult with parties prior to the issuance of the preliminary determinations.

Determination of Industry Support for the Petitions

Section 732(b)(1) of the Act requires that a petition be filed on behalf of the domestic industry. Section 732(c)(4)(A) of the Act provides that a petition meets this requirement if the domestic producers or workers who support the petition account for (1) at least 25 percent of the total production of the domestic like product and (2) more than 50 percent of the production of the domestic like product produced by that portion of the industry expressing support for or opposition to the petition. Moreover, section 732(c)(4)(D) of the Act provides that, if the petition does not establish support of domestic producers or workers accounting for more than 50 percent of the total production of the domestic like product, the Department shall: (i) Poll the industry or rely on other information in order to determine if there is support for the petition, as required by subparagraph (A), or (ii) determine industry support using a statistically valid sampling method.

Section 771(4)(A) of the Act defines the ‘‘industry’’ as the producers as a whole of a domestic like product. Thus, to determine whether the petitions have the requisite industry support, the statute directs the Department to look to producers and workers who produce the domestic like product. The International Trade Commission (ITC) is responsible for determining whether ‘‘the domestic industry’’ has been injured and must also determine what constitutes a domestic like product in order to define the industry. While the Department and the ITC must apply the same statutory definition regarding the domestic like product, they do so for different purposes and pursuant to separate and distinct authority. See section 771(10) of the Act. In addition, the Departments determination is subject to limitations of time and information. Although this may result in different definitions of the domestic like product, such differences

do not render the decision of either agency contrary to law.1

Section 771(10) of the Act defines the domestic like product as ‘‘a product which is like, or in the absence of like, most similar in characteristics and uses with, the article subject to an investigation under this subtitle.’’ Thus, the reference point from which the domestic like product analysis begins is ‘‘the article subject to an investigation,’’ i.e., the class or kind of merchandise to be investigated, which normally will be the scope as defined in the petition.

With regard to domestic like product, the petitioner does not offer a definition of domestic like product distinct from the scope of the investigations. Based on our analysis of the information presented by the petitioner, we have determined that there is a single domestic like product, coated free sheet paper, which is defined in the ‘‘Scope of Investigations’’ section above, and we have analyzed industry support in terms of the domestic like product.

On November 15 and 16, 2006, we received submissions on behalf of Chinese and Indonesian producers of CFS questioning the industry support calculation. See ‘‘Office of AD/CVD Operations Initiation Checklist for the Antidumping Duty Petition on Coated Free Sheet Paper from Indonesia,’’ at Attachment II (Nov. 20, 2006) (Indonesia Initiation Checklist), ‘‘Office of AD/CVD Operations Initiation Checklist for the Antidumping Duty Petition on Coated Free Sheet Paper from the Republic of Korea,’’ at Attachment II (Nov. 20, 2006) (Korea Initiation Checklist), and ‘‘Office of AD/ CVD Operations Initiation Checklist for the Antidumping Duty Petition on Coated Free Sheet Paper from the Peoples Republic of China,’’ at Attachment II (Nov. 20, 2006) (PRC Initiation Checklist), on file in the CRU. Our review of the data provided in the petition, supplemental submissions, and other information readily available to the Department indicates that Petitioners have established industry support representing at least 25 percent of the total production of the domestic like product; and more than 50 percent of the production of the domestic like product produced by that portion of the industry expressing support for or opposition to the petition, requiring no further action by the Department pursuant to section 732(c)(4)(D) of the Act. Therefore, the domestic producers (or workers) who support the petition

See USEC, Inc. v. United States, 132 F. Supp. 2d 1, 8 (CIT 2001), citing Algoma Steel Corp. Ltd. v. United States, 688 F. Supp. 639, 644 (1988), aff’d 865 F.2d 240 (Fed Cir. 1989) cert. denied 492 U.S. 919 (1989). 1

VerDate Aug<31>2005

16:58 Nov 24, 2006

Jkt 211001

PO 00000

Frm 00010

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\27NON1.SGM

27NON1

Document info
Document views835
Page views835
Page last viewedSun Dec 11 04:30:21 UTC 2016
Pages198
Paragraphs7125
Words78899

Comments