# Sensitivity analysis of the evaporation module of the E-DiGOR model

resulted in the same ratio of increase in the minimum water potential as an absolute value (Table 2). Since the dependent variable of equation (ψ_{ad}) was a logarithmic function (ln H_{r}) of relative humidity (fractional), the sensitivity coefficients of relative humidity showed a great deal of variation (Figure 4). The change pattern of ψ_{ad }was moderately consistent with the pattern of S_{Hr}. This means that the presence or absence of nonlinearities or correlative interactions

# References

Ács F (2003) A comparative analysis of transpiration and bare soil evaporation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 109: 139-162.

Allen RG, Smith M, Perrier A, Pereira LS (1994) An update for the definition of reference evapotranspiration. ICID Bull. 43: 92.

Alvenas G, Jansson P-E (1997) Model for evaporation, moisture and temperature of bare soil: calibration and sensitivity analysis. Agric For Meteorol 88: 47-56.

Aydın M, Yang SL, Kurt N, Yano T (2005) Test of a simple model for estimating evaporation from bare soils in different environments. Ecol Model 182: 91-105.

Aydın M (2008) A model for evaporation and drainage investigations at ground of ordinary rainfed-areas. Ecol Model 217: 148-156.

Aydın M, Yano T, Evrendilek F, Uygur V (2008) Implications of climate change for evaporation from bare soils in a Mediterranean environment. Environ Monit Assess 140: 123– 130.

Beven K (1979) A sensitivity analysis of the Penman-Monteith actual evapotranspiration estimates. J Hydrol 44: 169-190.

Boesten JJTI (1991) Sensitivity analysis of a mathematical model for pesticide leaching to grounwater. Pestic Sci 31: 375-388.

Brown RW, Oosterhuis DM (1992) Measuring plant and soil–water potentials with thermocouple psychrometers: some concerns. Agron J 84: 78-86.

Cariboni J, Gatelli D, Liska R, Saltelli A (2007) The role of sensitivity analysis in ecological modelling. Ecol Model 203: 167-182.

Coleman G, DeCoursey DG (1976) Sensitivity and model variance analysis applied to some evaporation and evapotranspiration models. Water Resour Res 12: 873-879.

Falge E, Reth S, Bruggemann N, Butterbach-Bahl K, Goldberg V, Oltchev A, Schaaf S, Spindler G, Stiller B, Queck R, Kostner B, Bernhofer C (2005) Comparison of surface energy exchange models with eddy flux data in forest and grassland ecosystems of Germany. Ecol Model 188: 174-216.

Ginot V, Gaba S, Beaudouin R, Aries F, Monod H (2006) Combined use of local and ANOVA-based global sensitivity analyses for the investigation of a stochastic dynamic model: application to the case study of an individual-based model of a fish population. Ecol Model 193: 479-491.

506

with other parameters should be considered (van Griensven et al. 2006). In spite of this fact, detailed information about the success of the model or its limitations was obtained, and the effect levels of the inputs on the predicted values of the model were determined. It can be concluded that normalised, local, and first-order sensitivity analysis is sufficient to evaluate the performance of the soil evaporation module of the E-DiGOR model.

Hamm NAS, Hall JW, Anderson MG (2006) Variance-based sensitivity analysis of the probability of hydrologically induced slope instability. Computers & Geosciences 32: 803-817.

Huang YC, Yeh HD (2007) The use of sensitivity analysis in on-line aquifer parameter estimation. J Hydrol 335: 406-418.

Lim JT, Gold HJ, Wilkerson GG, Raper CD (1989) A Monte Carlo/response surface strategy for sensitivity analysis: application to a dynamic model of vegetative plant growth. Applied Mathematical Modelling 13: 479-484.

Masada AB, Carmel Y (2008) Incorporating output variance in local

sensitivity analysis for stochastic communication). Ecol Model 213: 463-467.

models

(short

McCuen RH (1974) A sensitivity and error analysis of procedures used for estimating evaporation. Water Resour Bull 10: 486-498.

Morris MD (1991) Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics 33: 161-174.

Norton JP (2008) Algebraic sensitivity analysis of environmental models. Environmental Modelling & Software 23: 963-972.

Önder D, Aydın M, Önder S (2009) Estimation of actual soil evaporation using E-DiGOR model in different parts of Turkey. Afr J Agric Res 4: 505-510.

Piper BS (1989) Sensitivity of Penman estimates of evaporation to errors in input data. Agric Water Manage 15: 279-300.

Quevedo DI, Frances F (2007) A conceptual dynamic vegetation-soil model for arid and semiarid zones. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 4: 3469-3499.

Romano E, Giudici M (2007) Experimental and modeling study of the soil-atmosphere interaction and unsaturated water flow to estimate the recharge of a phreatic aquifer. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 12: 573-584.

Saltelli A, Tarantola S, Campolongo F, Ratto M (2004) Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models. John Wiley and Sons, England.

Saxton KE (1975) Sensitivity analysis of the combination evapotranspiration equation. Agric Meteorol 15: 343-353.

Sieber A, Uhlenbrook S (2005) Sensitivity analyses of a distributed catchment model to verify the model structure. J Hydrol 310: 216-235.