X hits on this document

161 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

4 / 74

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

RULE 35(b) STATEMENT......................................................................................1 POINT OF FACT MISAPPREHENDED BY THE PANEL...................................1 ARGUMENT ............................................................................................................2

  • I.

    The $290,000,000 Judgment Warrants En Banc Review ....................2

    • A.

      The Decision’s Admissibility Analysis Conflicts With The Daubert Trilogy And Decisions Of The Regional Circuits ................................................................4

    • B.

      The Decision’s Refusal To Review The Damages Award For Excessiveness Conflicts With All Prior Cases .................................................................................9

  • II.

    The Standard For Injunctive Relief Applied By The Decision Conflicts With Supreme Court And Regional Circuit Precedent ................................................................................13

III.

The Panel Should Grant Rehearing On Microsoft’s Challenge To The Legal Sufficiency Of The Jury’s Finding Of Willfulness.......................................................................14

CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................15

iii

Document info
Document views161
Page views161
Page last viewedSat Dec 03 07:34:09 UTC 2016
Pages74
Paragraphs2162
Words19614

Comments