X hits on this document

PDF document

Council on Chiropractic Practice - page 37 / 202

842 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

37 / 202

lateral cervical videofluoroscopic examinations. Proc of the Int’l Conf on Spinal Manip 1993; 37.

  • 97.

    Byrd R, Kahler J, Leaman S, et al. Reliability of magnetic resonance imaging for morphometry of the intervertebral foramen. Proc of the Int’l Conf on Spinal Manip 1990; 79-82.

  • 98.

    Cantu J, Cramer G, Dorsett R, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical intervertebral foramina: comparison of two techniques. Proc of the Int’l Conf on Spinal Manip 1994; 101-103.

  • 99.

    Cramer G, Cantu J, Greenstein J, et al. The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in determining the vertical dimensions of the cervical intervertebral foramina. Proc of the Int’l Conf on Spinal Manip 1993; 38-40.

  • 100.

    Cramer G, Howe J, Glenn W, et al. Comparison of computed tomography to magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of the intervertebral foramen. The National College of Chiropractic, Lombard, IL, Los Angeles College of Chiropractic Whittier, CA, Private Practice of Medical Radiology, Carson, CA, Computer programmer, Los Angeles, CA.

  • 101.

    Cramer G., Howe J, Glenn W, et al. Lumbar intervertebral foramen dimensions from thirty-seven human subjects as determined by magnetic resonance imaging. Proc of the Int’l Conf on Spinal Manip 1992; 3-5.

  • 102.

    Daruwalla J, Balasubramaniam P. Moiré topography in scoliosis—its accuracy in detecting the site and size of the curve. J Bone Joint Surg 1985; 67:211-213.

  • 103.

    Bennett SF, Hayde TN. Cervical spondylolisthesis: a case report. ACA J Chiro. 1991; 2:69-71.

  • 104.

    Denton T, Randall F, Deinlein D. The use of instant moiré photographs to reduce exposure from scoliosis radiographs. Spine 1992; 17(5):509-512.

  • 105.

    EilBert L, Spector B. The moiré contourographic analysis controversy: A question of validity in present-day clinical practice. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1979; 2:85.

  • 106.

    Eldevik O, Dugstad G, Orrison W, et al. The effect of clinical bias on the interpretation of myelography and spinal computed tomography. Radiology 37

_________________________________________________________ Council on Chiropractic Practice Clinical Practice Guideline Number 1 Vertebral Subluxation in Chiropractic Practice – 2003 Update & Revision

Document info
Document views842
Page views842
Page last viewedMon Dec 05 14:49:19 UTC 2016
Pages202
Paragraphs3948
Words54912

Comments