X hits on this document





28 / 98

demand equal to –0.19 among wives and–0.08 among husbands, suggesting that own-employer

take up among husbands is less sensitive to price than own-employer take up among wives.

Other research has found candidates for family coverage to be more price-responsive than single

workers (Blumberg et al. 2001). Estimating worker-level coverage (not only direct take up, but

coverage from any source), Bernard and Selden (2003) found significantly greater price

responsiveness among workers in small firms as well as among workers with lower income,

lower health risk, or both.


Methodological Issues

As with studies of employer offer, most studies of worker demand for employer-based

coverage are observational, not experimental. As a result, they usually must deal with the

absence of price data for workers who decline coverage, making it necessary to impute price for

these workers based on their characteristics.

Here again, the imputation of prices introduces potential endogeneity bias from two sources.

First, workers who select jobs with an affordable offer of health insurance may have a greater

demand for insurance that may not be observable in terms of the measures that are available

(Monheit and Vistness 1999). In short, their health plan premiums may be correlated with

unobservable components of their demand for insurance. Second, the quality of insurance plans

offered by employers is usually unobservable, and it may be correlated with the price. If so, the

price elasticity estimate is biased toward zero.

While instrumental variables may be used to address these endogeneity problems, finding

the right instrumental variable (one that is correlated with the endogenous variable but

uncorrelated with the dependent variable) can be very difficult. For example, Cutler (2002b)

used the state’s average marginal tax rate as the instrumental variable for the employee premium

share, but it may be inadequate as an instrumental variable: it may reflect the demand for


Document info
Document views377
Page views377
Page last viewedThu Oct 27 13:53:46 UTC 2016