below, shows the effects of SESS with an iterative detector in the worst-case jamming
conditions. This simulation assumes that the initial spreading sequences are synchronized and
that noise of the channel is negligible.
BER vs. Eb/Nj N=32 Tx=100,000 Worst-Case Jamming in SESS w/ Iterative Detector
jdc = 0.00032 jdc = 0.0016 jdc = 0.008 jdc = 0.04 jdc = 0.2 jdc = 1 AWGN Worst-Case w/o detector
Worst-Case Jamming w/ Detector
10 Eb/Nj (dB)
Figure 16 - Worst-Case Jamming SESS Simulation
As the same in DSSS, the envelope of the family of curves exhibits an inverse linear
relation between Pbmax and the Eb/Nj can be seen. This makes Equation (19), the worst-case
jamming in SESS with iterative detector, easily calculated by finding of the equation of the line
in Figure 16.
0.022 (/ )