# Perceived Effectiveness

A Spearman’s rho correlation analysis was performed with the sample of 63

questionnaire respondents participating in a counseling related profession to determine

the relationship that the scores of the MMPI-2 clinical and validity scales and the NEO

# PI-R domain scales have with self-perceived effectiveness. Self-perceived effectiveness

data was obtained from each respondent by a single question of the questionnaire:

# “Would you say that your work is effective?” The results of this analysis are found on

# Table 5. Self-perceived effectiveness showed no significant correlation (p = .002) with

MMPI-2 clinical and validity scales. There were also no noteworthy trends identified.

# Likewise, there were no statistically significant correlations between self-perceived

effectiveness and the NEO PI-R domain scales; however, the domain Agreeableness

showed a noteworthy trend (r = -.253, n = 63, p = .045). Since this correlation was not

significant after Bonferroni correction, the hypothesis that there is a correlation between

self-perceived effectiveness in the counseling profession and the personality profiles of

students of a seminary counselor education program as assessed by the MMPI-2 clinical

and validity scales and the NEO PI-R domain scales is not supported. The data failed to

support this hypothesis. Thus, the null hypothesis was retained.

Summary

This study investigated the relative usefulness of an admission screening

methodology that uses two well validated personality instruments (the MMPI-2 and the

NEO PI-R) to predict various post-program outcome criteria of success: final GPA,

74