X hits on this document

167 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

46 / 47

Walking a Nuclear Tightrope

Endnotes

1

Energy Information Administration. 2005. Annual energy review 200, DOE/EIA-0384. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy. August 15. Online at http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer/ nuclear.html.

2

Collins, S. J. 1997. Letter to the author, February 27. Samuel J. Collins was director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation in the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.*

3

Triner, E.C. 1974. Creditability. Letter to L.M. Muntzing (director of regulation, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission), May 16. Edwin C. Triner was director of the Office of Program Analysis– Regulation in the Atomic Energy Commission.

4

U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). 1996. Nuclear regulation: Oversight of quality assurance at nuclear power plants needs improvement, GAO/RCED-96-41. Washington, DC. January 23.

5

Altman, W., T. Ankrum, and W. Brach. 1984. Improving quality and the assurance of quality in the design and construction of nuclear power plants, NUREG-1055. Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. May.

6

U.S. General Accounting Office. 1996. ennessee alley Authority: Issues surrounding decision to contract out construction activities, GAO/RCED-92-105. Washington, DC. January 31.

7

Kozak, T.J. 2001. Letter to G. C. Campbell, vice president—–nuclear, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company, March 27. Thomas J. Kozak was chief of projects branch 4 in the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

8

Grobe, J. A. 2004. Letter to L. W. Myers, chief operating officer, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company, March 5. John A. Grobe was chairman of the Davis-Besse manual chapter 0350 oversight panel in the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

9

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Quality assurance criteria for nuclear power plants and fuel reprocessing plants. Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50. Washington, DC. Online at http://www.nrc. gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part00/part00-appb.html.

10

Ibid.

11

Altman, Ankrum, and Brach, 1984.

12

GAO, 1996.

13

GAO. 1997. Nuclear regulation: Preventing problem plants requires more effective NRC action, GAO/ RCED-97-145. Washington, DC. May.

*Mr. Collins’ response was a formal letter on NRC letterhead to the author. A copy was placed in the NRC’s formal document repository and is an official agency record.

Rev. 1 09/25/06



Document info
Document views167
Page views167
Page last viewedSat Dec 10 19:18:19 UTC 2016
Pages47
Paragraphs1517
Words14970

Comments