5-98-156-A15 Page 2
SUBSTANTIVE FILE DOCUMENTS:
City of Long Beach Certified Local Coastal Program, 7/22/80.
Coastal Development Permit 5-98-156 & amendments (Queensway Bay).
Coastal Development Permit 5-98-161 (Rainbow Harbor Concessions).
Coastal Development Permit 5-98-155 (Rainbow Harbor Vending).
Coastal Development Permit 5-96-268 (Long Beach Aquarium Parking Structure).
Coastal Development Permit 5-96-124 & amendments (Rainbow Harbor).
Coastal Development Permit 5-95-055 & amendments (Long Beach Aquarium).
STAFF NOTE: The proposed project is located on State Tidelands administered by the City of Long Beach. Pursuant to Section 30519 of the Coastal Act, a coastal development permit (amendment) must be obtained from the Commission because the proposed development is
located on State Tidelands within Commission's standard of review for
the Commission's area of original jurisdiction.
the Chapter 3 policies of the Coastal nature and may provide guidance.
The staff recommends that the Commission adopt the following resolution to APPROVE the permit amendment request with special conditions:
MOTION: "I move that the Commission approve with special conditions the proposed amendment to Coastal Development Permit 5-98-156 per the staff recommendation.”
Staff recommends a YES amendment and adoption of affirmative vote of a majority
the following resolution and findings.
of the Commissioners present.
result in approval The motion passes
of the only by
Resolution to Approve a Permit Amendment
The Commission hereby approves the coastal development permit amendment on the ground that the development as amended, will be in conformity with the policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act and will not prejudice the ability of the local government having jurisdiction over the area to prepare a Local Coastal Program conforming to the provisions of Chapter 3. Approval of the permit amendment complies with the California Environmental Quality Act because either 1) feasible mitigation measures and/or alternatives have been incorporated to substantially lessen any significant adverse effects of the amended development on the environment, or 2) there are no feasible mitigation measures or alternatives that would substantially lessen any significant adverse impacts of the amended development on the environment.