X hits on this document

# FORMATIVE EVALUATION OF ACADEMIC PROGRESS: - page 24 / 30

89 views

0 shares

24 / 30

TABLE 4 (Continued)

Distribution of Slopes

IX

X

XI

Common LS

2

2.04

4.7

16

3

1.81

6.6

7

4

1.43

7.3

8

5

1.23

8.5

4

6

1.53

10.1

11

Common Words

2

.46

4.7

14

3

.31

11.9

7

4

.39

10.9

14

5

.35

18.8

4

6

.25

19.7

16

[a] For graded LS, the one-way ANOVA for the effect of grade produced a significant F (4,1041) value of 93.26, p < .001; the F (1,1041) value for the linear trend was 168.98, p < .001 and for the quadratic trend, F (1,1041) = 197.27, p < .001.  Student-Newman-Keuls revealed that 4 = 6<5<3<2. For graded words, ANOVA indicated a significant F (4,1041) value of 50.84, p < .001; the F (1,1041) for the linear trend was 137.91, p < .001 and for the quadratic trend, F (1,1041) = 56.03, p < .001. Student-Newman-Keuls revealed 5<6 = 4 = 3<2. For common LS, ANOVA indicated a significant F (1,1041) value of 100.86, p < .001; the F (1,1041) for the linear trend was 375.26, p < .001 and for the quadratic trend, F (1,1041) = 33.23, p < .001. Student-Newman-Keuls revealed 6<5<4<3<2. For common words, ANOVA indicated a significant f (4,1041) value of 31.47, p < .001; the F (1,1041) for the linear trend was 125.05, p < .001 and for the quadratic trend, .51, ns.  Student-Newman-Keuls revealed 6<5 = 4<3<2.

TABLE 5

Slope Information for Year 1 in Math

Table Legend:

I - n

II - M

III - (SD)

IV - Kurtosis

V - (sek)

VI - Skewness

VII - (ses)

VIII - Min

IX - Max

X - % Negative

Number Scores

Slope (b) [a]

I

II

III

II

III

Digits

1

18

29.00

(2.57)

.53

( .10)

2

43

29.49

(1.67)

.20

( .11)

3

24

28.92

(2.92)

.42

( .26)

4

21

29.48

(2.62)

.77

( .31)

5

45

28.20

(3.80)

.70

( .31)

6

26

27.15

(3.91)

.48

( .38)

24

 Document views 89 Page views 89 Page last viewed Mon Jan 16 15:45:05 UTC 2017 Pages 30 Paragraphs 1832 Words 12541