X hits on this document





11 / 115

The defense presented Ramesh Kar, a materials scientist, to challenge the paint comparison tests performed by the prosecution expert, Stephan Schliebe.  Based on differences in the amounts of zinc, magnesium, silicon and titanium in samples of paint from the bubble shield snaps and the metal post, Kar concluded they were not the same paint.  

Testifying on his own behalf, defendant denied having either robbed or killed Koll.  On the morning of November 3, 1980, he parked his car in the supermarket lot across from the courthouse and attended the morning court session.  Just before court recessed, defense attorney Lara and prosecutor Haney retired to the judge’s chambers.  Lara came out and told defendant the prosecutor had offered a plea bargain.  Court then recessed at 11:45 a.m. or noon, and Lara told defendant to meet him at his office at 1:00 p.m.  

Defendant telephoned his home, then talked with Brother Ed Bryant and Curtis Moore for a few minutes.  He went to the supermarket at 12:15 or 12:20 p.m., bought some food and ate it in his car, staying there for 20 or 30 minutes.  About 12:45 p.m., he left on foot for Lara’s office.  After they talked, he went up to the courtroom hallway and waited for court to resume.  

During the afternoon session, Lara informed him privately that Koll had been killed over the lunch hour.  Later, he was asked to take a gunshot residue test and agreed; he did not ask to use the bathroom first.  While defendant was in the attorney conference room for the test, Sergeant Lynn Froistad came in with a paper bag, which he handed to Officer Knebel.  Knebel took out a bubble shield and pushed it at defendant, asking if it looked familiar.  Defendant pushed it away with his left hand.  

Defendant further testified that prior to November 3 Lara had told him that Koll had identified two or three other people as the robber.  Defendant had

Document info
Document views256
Page views256
Page last viewedWed Oct 26 23:11:34 UTC 2016