X hits on this document

Word document

I.EXECUTIVE ORDERS - page 151 / 359

1769 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

151 / 359

of qualification by credentials and experience of design component members for the areas of expertise specific to the project and statements of qualification by experience and resources of the construction team component. The completed response form and any other required information shall be transmitted by the responding design-builder by the deadline to submit such forms and information as provided in the request for qualifications package. Any response failing to meet all of the requirements contained in the request for qualifications package shall not be considered by the public agency. False or misrepresented information furnished in response to a request for qualifications package shall be grounds for rejection.

AUTHORITY NOTE:Promulgated in accordance with R.S. 39:121 and RS 38:2225.2.1.

HISTORICAL NOTE:Promulgated by the Office of the Governor, Division of Administration, Office of Facility Planning and Control, LR 34:2122 (October 2008).

§179.Request for Qualifications—Evaluation Committee

A.A qualifications evaluation committee shall evaluate the responses to the request for qualifications package received by the public agency. The qualifications evaluation committee shall consist of a minimum of three members designated by the Director of Facility Planning and Control for projects administered by that agency or the equivalent agency head for other agencies.

AUTHORITY NOTE:Promulgated in accordance with R.S. 39:121 and RS 38:2225.2.1.

HISTORICAL NOTE:Promulgated by the Office of the Governor, Division of Administration, Office of Facility Planning and Control, LR 34:2123 (October 2008).

§181.Request for Qualifications—Evaluation Criteria

A.The following general criteria used by the qualifications evaluation committee in evaluating responses to the request for qualifications package for design-build services shall apply to both the design and construction components of any responding entity.

1.Professional training and experience of both the design and construction entity components and of key personnel in general and as related to the project under consideration.
2.Past and current professional accomplishments, for which opinions of clients or former clients and information gathered by inspection of current or recent projects may be considered.
3.Capacity for timely completion of the work, taking into consideration the person's or firm's current and projected workload and professional and support manpower.
4.The nature, quantity, and value of agency work awarded to both the design and construction components the applicant entity, it being generally desirable to allocate such work among persons who are desirous and qualified to perform such work.
5.Past performance on public projects, including any problems with time delays, cost overruns, and design inadequacies for which the designer was held to be at fault.
6.Whether problems as indicated in Subclause (e) herein resulted in litigation between the public agency and the person performing professional services, particularly if the designer is currently involved in unsettled litigation with a public agency or has been involved in litigation with a
public agency where the public agency prevailed.
7.Any project-specific criteria as may apply to project needs.

AUTHORITY NOTE:Promulgated in accordance with R.S. 39:121 and RS 38:2225.2.1.

HISTORICAL NOTE:Promulgated by the Office of the Governor, Division of Administration, Office of Facility Planning and Control, LR 34:2123 (October 2008).

§183.Request for Qualifications—Short List Selection

A.The qualifications evaluation committee shall select a short list of not fewer than three of the highest rated entities; however, if fewer than three responses are received, the head of the public agency may approve proceeding with the evaluation process. The qualifications evaluation committee may, at its discretion, be assisted by other agency personnel in its evaluation of an entity's qualifications. The qualifications evaluation committee shall present its short list to the Director of Facility Planning and Control for projects administered by that agency or the equivalent agency head for other agencies.

AUTHORITY NOTE:Promulgated in accordance with R.S. 39:121 and RS 38:2225.2.1.

HISTORICAL NOTE:Promulgated by the Office of the Governor, Division of Administration, Office of Facility Planning and Control, LR 34:2123 (October 2008).

§185.Technical Proposal—Notification

A.The entities included on the short list shall be notified of their selection and invited to submit a detailed technical proposal for the design-build project. The specific requirements of the technical proposal shall be identified by the agency to the entities included in the short list by means of a "scope of services package" which shall be provided to all entities invited to submit a technical proposal. The scope of services package may include enhancements, clarifications and modifications to the scope of services included with the request for qualifications only if they fall within the scope of the project.

AUTHORITY NOTE:Promulgated in accordance with R.S. 39:121 and RS 38:2225.2.1.

HISTORICAL NOTE:Promulgated by the Office of the Governor, Division of Administration, Office of Facility Planning and Control, LR 34:2123 (October 2008).

§187.Technical Proposal—Scope of Services Package

A.Generally the scope of services package shall define the scope of work or architectural program. The scope of services package shall also define the response including the format and the required information including, but not limited to, the following:

1.statement of purpose;
2.definition of terms;
3.time factors;
4.point of contact;
5.requirements for submission;
6.design-builder responsibilities;
7.public agency responsibilities;
8.detailed evaluation criteria including scoring and weighting factors;
9.form of contract;
10.insurance, indemnification and limits of liability;
11.surety requirements;
12.payment terms;
13.termination;
14.audit requirements;
15.level of quality;

Louisiana Register   Vol. 34, No. 10   October 20, 2008

Document info
Document views1769
Page views1772
Page last viewedSat Dec 10 22:32:25 UTC 2016
Pages359
Paragraphs18243
Words293762

Comments