X hits on this document

86 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

30 / 36

award by the tribunal, is a rule of international public order44; for Maître

Boisséson, the rule that such a “deliberation” should be, and should

remain, secret is a “fundamental principle, which constitutes one of the

mainsprings of arbitration, as it does of all judicial decisions”.

45

In adopting this approach, these distinguished French lawyers have

the support of the rules of the International Centre for the Settlement of

Investment Dispute (ICSID) which stipulates, in Rule 15, that:

(1)

The deliberations of the Tribunal shall take place in private and

remain secret.

(2)

Only members of the Tribunal shall take part in its deliberations.

No other person shall be admitted unless the Tribunal decides

otherwise.

It will not have escaped notice that, in the Swedish Court of Appeal

mentioned previously, the secrecy of the arbitrators’ deliberations was not

maintained. Indeed, it could not have been when the arbitrators

themselves were called upon to testify in court as to the meetings and

44 Professor J.D. Bredin, “Le Secret du Délibéré Arbitral” in Etudes Offertes à Pierre Bellet (LITEC).

45 de Boisséson, “Le Droit Français de l’Arbitrage National et International (1990) p.296. See also the comment in Robert “L’Arbitrage: Droit Interne, Droit International Privé (5ème Edition, Dalloz) at para. 360: “Although it is practised according to a certain number of foreign laws, notably anglo- saxon, the dissenting opinion is prohibited in French domestic law since it violates the secrecy of the tribunal’s deliberation …” (my translation).

  • -

    30-

X:\DAR\DANGEROUS DISSENTS

Document info
Document views86
Page views86
Page last viewedThu Dec 08 06:12:20 UTC 2016
Pages36
Paragraphs848
Words7635

Comments