Filling material (non-reactive):
A case by case approach to define the properties shall be taken
Filling material (reactive):
See EOTA TR 024, clause 3.1.11
Expansion pressure7(if relevant)
See EOTA TR 024, clause 3.1.12
See EOTA TR 024, clause 3.1.14
Hardness after curing
one of the methods of B.5.3 shall be used
Rubber components of modular systems:
one of the methods of B.5.2.1 shall be used
126.96.36.199.3.3 Exposure conditions
Use category related to environmental conditions type Z2:
See EOTA TR 024 (reactive materials) clause 4.2.7
Use category related to environmental conditions type Z1:
See EOTA TR 024 (reactive materials) clause 4.2.6
Use category related to environmental conditions type Y2
See EOTA TR 024 (reactive materials) clause 4.2.5
Use category related to environmental conditions type Y1
See EOTA TR 024 (reactive materials) clause 4.2.4
Use category related to environmental conditions type X
See EOTA TR 024 (reactive materials) clause 4.2.3
188.8.131.52.4 Component and materials compatibility
The Approval Body shall examine the design of the product and make an assessment, using well-established principles, of the suitability of materials in contact. It is impossible to prescribe all the possible risk areas but these include the possibility of bi-metallic corrosion, the effects of over-painting etc.
184.108.40.206 Method of assessing and judging
220.127.116.11.1 Materials/products covered by a standard
When the material/product (e.g. metal parts or other components) meet the relevant requirements given in the standards referenced they are considered being durable.
18.104.22.168.2 Materials/products not covered by a standard
Basically, to achieve a positive assessment of durability no change in the assessed property is allowed. However, as repeatability and reproducibility of most of the test methods to determine relevant properties are unknown a deviation of the mean values of the property assessed before and after exposure of not more than 15% may be taken as a positive result of the durability assessment.
In case of high scatter of the test results an alternative is to take a statistical approach, using an appropriate high number of test specimens. This approach may be used to demonstrate that the mean value of the property after exposure does not deviate from the mean value before exposure.
3 Evaluation and attestation of conformity and CE marking
3.1 System of attestation of conformity
See Part 1 – "General"
3.2 Tasks and responsibilities for the manufacturer and notified bodies
9 Only for ablative products