X hits on this document

PDF document

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Public and Indian Housing - page 32 / 74

192 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

32 / 74

At or above 90% but below100% of FMR 100% of FMR Above 100% but at or below 110% of FMR Above 110% of FMR (if HUD approved; describe circumstances below) b. If the payment standard is lower than FMR, why has the PHA selected this standard? (select all that apply) n/a FMRs are adequate to ensure success among assisted families in the PHA’s segment of the FMR area The PHA has chosen to serve additional families by lowering the payment standard Reflects market or submarket Other (list below)

c. If the payment standard is higher than FMR, why has the PHA chosen this level? (select all that apply) FMRs are not adequate to ensure success among assisted families in the PHA’s segment of the FMR area Reflects market or submarket To increase housing options for families Other (list below)

d. How often are payment standards reevaluated for adequacy? (select one) Annually Other (list below)

  • e.

    What factors will the PHA consider in its assessment of the adequacy of its payment standard? (select all that apply) Success rates of assisted families Rent burdens of assisted families Other (list below)

    • (2)

      Minimum Rent

a. What amount best reflects the PHA’s minimum rent? (select one) $0 $1-$25 $26-$50

b.

Yes

No: Has the PHA adopted any discretionary minimum rent hardship exemption policies? (if yes, list below)

FY 2000 Annual Plan for the South Delta Regional Housing Authority, Page 26

HUD 50075 OMB Approval No: 2577-0226 Expires: 03/31/2002

Document info
Document views192
Page views192
Page last viewedWed Dec 07 22:32:51 UTC 2016
Pages74
Paragraphs1654
Words16447

Comments