X hits on this document

470 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

3 / 88

in West Hararghe. (p.64)

See also many statistics re. specific behavior changes.

Observations

A rare example of a quasi-experimental, sophisticated quantitative evaluation design.

Additional details for meta-evaluation:

Contribution to MDG(s)?

6: HIV-AIDS

Address main UCP “interim outcomes”?

Were goals/objectives achieved?

1=Yes (see p.63 ff)

ToR included?

No

Reference to CI Program Principles?

No

Reference to CARE / other standards?

No

Participatory evaluation methods?

No

Baseline?

Yes

Evaluation design

Before-and-after (compared to baseline)

With-and-without (comparison group)

A baseline and outcome surveys, respectively, were fielded in September 2003 and May-June 2005 in both of the sites (p.2)l

Comment

Strong quantitative methods (but not qualitative nor participatory)

Document info
Document views470
Page views470
Page last viewedFri Jan 20 12:36:14 UTC 2017
Pages88
Paragraphs1879
Words20990

Comments