in West Hararghe. (p.64)
See also many statistics re. specific behavior changes.
A rare example of a quasi-experimental, sophisticated quantitative evaluation design.
Additional details for meta-evaluation:
Contribution to MDG(s)?
Address main UCP “interim outcomes”?
Were goals/objectives achieved?
1=Yes (see p.63 ff)
Reference to CI Program Principles?
Reference to CARE / other standards?
Participatory evaluation methods?
Before-and-after (compared to baseline)
With-and-without (comparison group)
A baseline and outcome surveys, respectively, were fielded in September 2003 and May-June 2005 in both of the sites (p.2)l
Strong quantitative methods (but not qualitative nor participatory)