X hits on this document

Word document

Securities and Exchange Board of India - page 4 / 43





4 / 43


               Securities and Exchange Board of India


For venture capital activity, high capitalisation of venture capital companies is essential to withstand the losses in 80% of the projects. In India, we do not have such strong companies.


The FVCIs are also more experienced in providing the needed managerial expertise and other supports.


Augmenting the Domestic Pool of Resources:

The present pool of funds available for venture capital is very limited and is  predominantly contributed by foreign funds to the extent of 80 percent.  The pool of domestic venture capital needs to be augmented by increasing the list of sophisticated institutional investors permitted to invest in venture capital funds.    This should include banks, mutual funds and insurance companies upto prudential limits.   Later, as expertise grows and the venture capital industry matures, other institutional investors, such as pension funds, should also be permitted. The venture capital funding is high-risk investment  and should be restricted to sophisticated investors.   However, investing in venture capital funds can be  a valuable return-enhancing tool for such investors while the increase in risk at the portfolio level would be minimal.   Internationally, over 50% of venture capital comes from pension funds, banks, mutual funds, insurance funds and charitable institutions.


Flexibility in Investment and Exit:  


Allowing multiple flexible structures:

Eligibility for registration as venture capital funds should be neutral to firm structure. The government should consider creating new structures, such as limited partnerships, limited liability partnerships and limited liability corporations. At present, venture capital funds can be structured as trusts or companies in order to be eligible for registration with SEBI.   Internationally, limited partnerships, Limited Liability Partnership and limited liability corporations have provided the necessary flexibility in risk-sharing, compensation arrangements amongst investors and tax pass through. Therefore, these structures are commonly used and widely accepted globally specially in USA. Hence, it is necessary to provide for alternative eligible structures.


Flexibility in the matter of investment ceiling and sectoral restrictions:

70% of a venture capital fund’s investible funds must be invested in unlisted equity or equity-linked instruments, while the rest may be invested in other instruments.  Though sectoral restrictions for investment by VCFs are not consistent with the very concept of venture funding, certain restrictions could be put by specifying a negative list which could include

Report of K B Chandrasekhar Committee on Venture Capital4

Document info
Document views132
Page views132
Page last viewedTue Jan 17 11:50:16 UTC 2017